These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30887962)

  • 1. All-on-four rehabilitation using photogrammetric impression technique.
    Sánchez-Monescillo A; Hernanz-Martín J; González-Serrano C; González-Serrano J; Duarte S
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(4):288-293. PubMed ID: 30887962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photogrammetric and Intraoral Digital Impression Technique for the Rehabilitation of Multiple Unfavorably Positioned Dental Implants: A Clinical Report.
    Molinero-Mourelle P; Lam W; Cascos-Sánchez R; Azevedo L; Gómez-Polo M
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 31429638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques.
    Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Mancl L; Brudvik JS; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 24079558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
    Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereophotogrammetric impression making for polyoxymethylene, milled immediate partial fixed dental prostheses.
    Gómez-Polo M; Gómez-Polo C; Del Río J; Ortega R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):506-510. PubMed ID: 28709673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for "All-on-Four" Restorations.
    Gherlone E; Capparé P; Vinci R; Ferrini F; Gastaldi G; Crespi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):324-30. PubMed ID: 27004280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Impression Taking for Maxillary Full-Arch Restoration With Immediate Loading: A Case Report.
    Rico JP; Brinkmann JC; Martin MC; González MA; Arribas CT; Alonso VR; Suárez CL; Suárez García MJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Apr; 48(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 33710306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Accuracy of photogrammetry and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an
    Sun YJ; Ma BW; Yue XX; Lin X; Geng W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):168-172. PubMed ID: 35152653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A combined digital and stereophotogrammetric technique for rehabilitation with immediate loading of complete-arch, implant-supported prostheses: A randomized controlled pilot clinical trial.
    Peñarrocha-Diago M; Balaguer-Martí JC; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Balaguer-Martínez JF; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Agustín-Panadero R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 28385445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photogrammetry Impression Technique: A Case History Report.
    Sánchez-Monescillo A; Sánchez-Turrión A; Vellon-Domarco E; Salinas-Goodier C; Prados-Frutos JC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):71-3. PubMed ID: 26757333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flügge T; van der Meer WJ; Gonzalez BG; Vach K; Wismeijer D; Wang P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():374-392. PubMed ID: 30328182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.
    Nagata K; Fuchigami K; Okuhama Y; Wakamori K; Tsuruoka H; Nakashizu T; Hoshi N; Atsumi M; Kimoto K; Kawana H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):464. PubMed ID: 34556111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants.
    Pradíes G; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Giménez B; Martínez-Rus F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Apr; 145(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 24686966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15903174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation.
    Monaco C; Ragazzini N; Scheda L; Evangelisti E
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):383-385. PubMed ID: 29191608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.
    Beri A; Pisulkar SK; Bagde AD; Bansod A; Dahihandekar C; Paikrao B
    Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1048. PubMed ID: 36575547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.
    Pesce P; Pera F; Setti P; Menini M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):171-175. PubMed ID: 29518813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.