264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30888516)
1. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins.
Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies.
Schnabel F; Boolbol SK; Gittleman M; Karni T; Tafra L; Feldman S; Police A; Friedman NB; Karlan S; Holmes D; Willey SC; Carmon M; Fernandez K; Akbari S; Harness J; Guerra L; Frazier T; Lane K; Simmons RM; Estabrook A; Allweis T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1589-95. PubMed ID: 24595800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MarginProbe© reduces the rate of re-excision following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Blohmer JU; Tanko J; Kueper J; Groß J; Völker R; Machleidt A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 26796680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery?
Kapoor NS; Eaton A; King TA; Patil S; Stempel M; Morris E; Brogi E; Morrow M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):600-6. PubMed ID: 22941162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women with breast cancer.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; McCready DR; Escallon J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29525464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?
Walsh SM; Brennan SB; Zabor EC; Rosenberger LH; Stempel M; Lebron-Zapata L; Gemignani ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4246-4253. PubMed ID: 31396783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Single institution's randomized double-armed prospective study of lumpectomy margins with adjunctive use of the MarginProbe in nonpalpable breast cancers.
Geha RC; Taback B; Cadena L; Borden B; Feldman S
Breast J; 2020 Nov; 26(11):2157-2162. PubMed ID: 32772474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure does not significantly reduce re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
LeeVan E; Ho BT; Seto S; Shen J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 32607640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
van Deurzen CH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Margin Assessment and Re-excision Rates for Patients Who Have Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Cen C; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Guth A; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):5142-5148. PubMed ID: 33635409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.
Gibson GR; Lesnikoski BA; Yoo J; Mott LA; Cady B; Barth RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):693-704. PubMed ID: 11597009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer.
Tartter PI; Kaplan J; Bleiweiss I; Gajdos C; Kong A; Ahmed S; Zapetti D
Am J Surg; 2000 Feb; 179(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10773138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes after breast conserving surgery.
Woeste MR; Bhutiani N; Donaldson M; McMasters KM; Ajkay N
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 123(2):439-445. PubMed ID: 33259649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
