These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30888669)
1. Benefits of Robotic Camera Assistance in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-Guided Camera-Holder. Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Hess S; Merscher A; Glanemann M; Birk D Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():87-92. PubMed ID: 30888669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic Camera Assistance and Its Benefit in 1033 Traditional Laparoscopic Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-guided Camera Holder. Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Fritz M; Djalali P; Birk D Surg Technol Int; 2014 Nov; 25():19-23. PubMed ID: 25419950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Camera Assistance: The Future of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery? Ali JM; Lam K; Coonar AS Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):485-491. PubMed ID: 29938603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic bariatric surgery: A general review of the current status. Jung MK; Hagen ME; Buchs NC; Buehler LH; Morel P Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28544251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ergonomics in handheld and robot-assisted camera control: a randomized controlled trial. Wijsman PJM; Molenaar L; Van't Hullenaar CDP; van Vugt BST; Bleeker WA; Draaisma WA; Broeders IAMJ Surg Endosc; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3919-3925. PubMed ID: 30746574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early Australian experience in robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a single site series. Silverman CD; Ghusn MA ANZ J Surg; 2017 May; 87(5):385-389. PubMed ID: 27080457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Gillen S; Pletzer B; Heiligensetzer A; Wolf P; Kleeff J; Feussner H; Fürst A Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 23990155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bariatric Surgeon Ergonomics: A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Robotics. Hilt L; Sherman B; Tan WH; Lak K; Gould JC; Kindel TL; Higgins RM J Surg Res; 2024 Mar; 295():864-873. PubMed ID: 37968140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial. Kudo T; Kanaji S; Harada H; Ohmura Y; Sawada R; Urakawa N; Goto H; Hasegawa H; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Kakeji Y Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):564-570. PubMed ID: 36788211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gaze gesture based human robot interaction for laparoscopic surgery. Fujii K; Gras G; Salerno A; Yang GZ Med Image Anal; 2018 Feb; 44():196-214. PubMed ID: 29277075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Robotic Camera Holder Controlled by Head Movements: Exploring This New Robot-Surgeon Interface. Bucher JN; Bruewer K; Dietz LJ; Trebesius N; Hidding J; Wysocki M; Schoenberg MB; Werner J; Karcz K Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):499-506. PubMed ID: 32406783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder. Merola S; Weber P; Wasielewski A; Ballantyne GH Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12008762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Endoscope Control - State of the Art of Voice Control and Other Options for Laparoscopic Camera Robot Guidance. Jell A; Fuchtmann J; Xiao M; Bernhard L; Berlet M; Feussner H; Wilhelm D Surg Technol Int; 2022 May; 40():17-24. PubMed ID: 35546494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a stand-alone robotic camera holding system: technology that improves laparoscopy. Rade M; Birkett D; Sherman J; Nepomnayshy D Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Mar; 31(3):404-409. PubMed ID: 32852261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder Economically Viable? A Cost Comparison of Surgical Assistant Versus the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder in Laparoscopic Liver Resections. Stott MC; Barrie J; Sebastien D; Hammill C; Subar DA Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Oct; 27(5):375-378. PubMed ID: 28727633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the image "right" for everyone? Introduction to the parallax effect in laparoscopic surgery. Cahais J; Schwarz L; Bridoux V; Huet E; Tuech JJ J Visc Surg; 2017 Feb; 154(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 27378511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decreasing strain on the surgeon in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery by using semi-active robotics. Tchartchian G; Dietzel J; Bojahr B; Hackethal A; De Wilde R Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 20947079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic gastric bypass : First experiences with the DaVinci system in bariatric surgery]. Beckmann JH; Aselmann H; Egberts JH; Bernsmeier A; Laudes M; Becker T; Schafmayer C; Ahrens M Chirurg; 2018 Aug; 89(8):612-620. PubMed ID: 29589076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery using robotic scope holder: Our initial experiences. Park JO; Kim MR; Park YJ; Kim MS; Sun DI J Minim Access Surg; 2020; 16(3):235-238. PubMed ID: 31031326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]