These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30889333)

  • 1. Insane: James Holmes, Clark v. Arizona, and America's Insanity Defense.
    Collins E
    J Law Health; 2018; 31(1):33-54. PubMed ID: 30889333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arizona's Insanity Defense,
    Bloom JD; Kirkorsky SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Dec; 49(4):618-622. PubMed ID: 34479941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.
    Wortzel H; Metzner J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4.
    Landess JS; Holoyda BJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2021 Jun; 49(2):231-240. PubMed ID: 33789990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2021 Jan; 72(1):104-106. PubMed ID: 33167811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Law & psychiatry: insanity, guilty minds, and psychiatric testimony.
    Appelbaum PS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2006 Oct; 57(10):1370-2. PubMed ID: 17035552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overlapping universe: understanding legal insanity and psychosis.
    Torry ZD; Billick SB
    Psychiatr Q; 2010 Sep; 81(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 20373024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Migration of Arizona's Post-Insanity Defense Procedures to a Modified GBMI Model.
    Kirkorsky SE; Shao W; Bloom JD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Jun; 47(2):217-223. PubMed ID: 31028103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guilty but insane: the insanity defence in Ireland, 1850-1995.
    Gibbons P; Mulryan N; O'Connor A
    Br J Psychiatry; 1997 May; 170():467-72. PubMed ID: 9307699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abolition of the insanity defense violates due process.
    Morse SJ; Bonnie RJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 24335319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The insanity plea in early nineteenth century America.
    Spiegel AD; Spiegel MB
    J Community Health; 1998 Jun; 23(3):227-47. PubMed ID: 9615297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. America's First
    Weiss KJ; Gupta N
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Dec; 46(4):503-512. PubMed ID: 30593481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diminished capacity as an alternative to McNaghten in California law.
    Bromberg W
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 1633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary: the insanity defense and youths in juvenile court.
    Rogers JE; Myers WC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 24335320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The slayer statute and insanity.
    Piel J; Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 20542948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Criminal responsibility and confinement of the insane from antiquity to early modern Japan].
    Hiruta G
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2003; 105(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 12708014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From stack-firing to pyromania: medico-legal concepts of insane arson in British, US and European contexts, c. 1800-1913. Part 2 .
    Andrews J
    Hist Psychiatry; 2010 Dec; 21(84 Pt 4):387-405. PubMed ID: 21877418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When killing isn't murder: psychiatric and psychological defences to murder when the insanity defence is not applicable.
    Samuels A; O'Driscoll C; Allnutt S
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Dec; 15(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 17999258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not guilty of murder by reason of paroxysmal insanity: the "mad" doctor vs. "common-sense" doctors in an 1865 trial.
    Spiegel AD; Spiegel MS
    Psychiatr Q; 1991; 62(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1771196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.