These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30890093)

  • 21. MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering.
    Penn D; Potts W
    Proc Biol Sci; 1998 Jul; 265(1403):1299-306. PubMed ID: 9718737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Complexity and context of MHC-correlated mating preferences in wild populations.
    Roberts SC
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(15):3121-3. PubMed ID: 19682244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MHC-dependent mate choice in humans: why genomic patterns from the HapMap European American dataset support the hypothesis.
    Laurent R; Chaix R
    Bioessays; 2012 Apr; 34(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 22344965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gene duplication and divergence produce divergent MHC genotypes without disassortative mating.
    Dearborn DC; Gager AB; McArthur AG; Gilmour ME; Mandzhukova E; Mauck RA
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Sep; 25(17):4355-67. PubMed ID: 27376487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The hidden benefits of sex: evidence for MHC-associated mate choice in primate societies.
    Setchell JM; Huchard E
    Bioessays; 2010 Nov; 32(11):940-8. PubMed ID: 20827785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mating preferences can drive expansion or contraction of major histocompatibility complex gene family.
    Bentkowski P; Radwan J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Feb; 287(1921):20192706. PubMed ID: 32097586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of genetic dissimilarity in the reproductive success and mate choice of brown trout - females fishing for optimal MHC dissimilarity.
    Forsberg LA; Dannewitz J; Petersson E; Grahn M
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 17714303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MHC diversity and mate choice in the magellanic penguin, Spheniscus magellanicus.
    Knafler GJ; Clark JA; Boersma PD; Bouzat JL
    J Hered; 2012; 103(6):759-68. PubMed ID: 22952272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. MHC genotype predicts mate choice in the ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus.
    Baratti M; Dessì-Fulgheri F; Ambrosini R; Bonisoli-Alquati A; Caprioli M; Goti E; Matteo A; Monnanni R; Ragionieri L; Ristori E; Romano M; Rubolini D; Scialpi A; Saino N
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1531-42. PubMed ID: 22591334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genes and Group Membership Predict Gidgee Skink (Egernia stokesii) Reproductive Pairs.
    Pearson SK; Godfrey SS; Schwensow N; Bull CM; Gardner MG
    J Hered; 2017 Jun; 108(4):369-378. PubMed ID: 28407082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The major histocompatibility complex and mate choice: inbreeding avoidance and selection of good genes.
    Grob B; Knapp LA; Martin RD; Anzenberger G
    Exp Clin Immunogenet; 1998; 15(3):119-29. PubMed ID: 9813409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MHC-dependent mate choice is linked to a trace-amine-associated receptor gene in a mammal.
    Santos PS; Courtiol A; Heidel AJ; Höner OP; Heckmann I; Nagy M; Mayer F; Platzer M; Voigt CC; Sommer S
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38490. PubMed ID: 27941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Seeing-good-gene-based mate choice: From genes to behavioural preferences.
    Sun L; Zhou T; Stone GN; Wan QH; Fang SG
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Nov; 88(11):1708-1719. PubMed ID: 31332779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marriage does not relate to major histocompatibility complex: a genetic analysis based on 3691 couples.
    Croy I; Ritschel G; Kreßner-Kiel D; Schäfer L; Hummel T; Havlíček J; Sauter J; Ehninger G; Schmidt AH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Oct; 287(1936):20201800. PubMed ID: 33023409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Condition-dependent mate choice and a reproductive disadvantage for MHC-divergent male tiger salamanders.
    Bos DH; Williams RN; Gopurenko D; Bulut Z; DeWoody JA
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Aug; 18(15):3307-15. PubMed ID: 19508451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No evidence for major histocompatibility complex-dependent mating patterns in a free-living ruminant population.
    Paterson S; Pemberton JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Dec; 264(1389):1813-9. PubMed ID: 9447738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sequence-based evidence for major histocompatibility complex-disassortative mating in a colonial seabird.
    Juola FA; Dearborn DC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jan; 279(1726):153-62. PubMed ID: 21613297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Good vs complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice.
    Howard RS; Lively CM
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 4():48. PubMed ID: 15555062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Landry C; Garant D; Duchesne P; Bernatchez L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jun; 268(1473):1279-85. PubMed ID: 11410155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolution of MHC genetic diversity: a tale of incest, pestilence and sexual preference.
    Potts WK; Wakeland EK
    Trends Genet; 1993 Dec; 9(12):408-12. PubMed ID: 8122307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.