BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3089023)

  • 1. Sex determination of prehistoric central California skeletal remains using discriminant analysis of the femur and humerus.
    Dittrick J; Suchey JM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 May; 70(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 3089023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metric determination of sex from the humerus in a Guatemalan forensic sample.
    Ríos Frutos L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):153-7. PubMed ID: 15567620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex determination from the distal part of the femur in a French contemporary population.
    Alunni-Perret V; Staccini P; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 17624707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Throwing in the Middle and Upper Paleolithic: inferences from an analysis of humeral retroversion.
    Rhodes JA; Churchill SE
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Jan; 56(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19004469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations.
    Robinson MS; Bidmos MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Apr; 186(1-3):86.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The femoral head: sex assessment of prehistoric New Zealand Polynesian skeletal remains.
    Murphy AM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(2-3):210-3. PubMed ID: 16182968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple univariate technique for determining sex from fragmentary femora: its application to a Scottish short cist population.
    MacLaughlin SM; Bruce MF
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1985 Aug; 67(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 4061594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex determination using the femur in an ancient Japanese population.
    Ozer I; Katayama K
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Mar; 32(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18494190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex estimation of infants between birth and one year through discriminant analysis of the humerus and femur.
    Stull KE; Godde K
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 23009735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear and geometric morphometric analysis of long bone scaling patterns in Jurassic neosauropod dinosaurs: their functional and paleobiological implications.
    Bonnan MF
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Sep; 290(9):1089-111. PubMed ID: 17721981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex estimation using the femur of Austrians born in the 19th to the middle of the 20th century.
    Kanz F; Fitzl C; Vlcek A; Frommlet F
    Anthropol Anz; 2015; 72(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 25776530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cranial muscle markers: a preliminary examination of size, sex, and age effects.
    Weiss E
    Homo; 2010 Feb; 61(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19969297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal allometry and interlimb scaling patterns in mustelid carnivorans.
    Heinrich RE; Biknevicius AR
    J Morphol; 1998 Feb; 235(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 9438972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: variability and commonality among modern humans.
    Auerbach BM; Ruff CB
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Feb; 50(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 16310833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Purkait's triangle method for determining sexual dimorphism.
    Brown RP; Ubelaker DH; Schanfield MS
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 May; 52(3):553-6. PubMed ID: 17456081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new method for assessing the sex of fragmentary skeletal remains: femoral shaft circumference.
    Black TK
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1978 Feb; 48(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 637123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in proximal humeral outline shape: elliptical Fourier functions.
    Tanaka H; Lestrel PE; Uetake T; Kato S; Ohtsuki F
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Mar; 45(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 10782949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of mobility on femur midshaft external shape and robusticity.
    Wescott DJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Jun; 130(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 16365861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of sexual variation in Indian femur.
    Purkait R; Chandra H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Nov; 146(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15485718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body size, locomotion, and long bone cross-sectional geometry in indriid primates.
    Demes B; Jungers WL; Selpien K
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Dec; 86(4):537-47. PubMed ID: 1776660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.