121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30891187)
1. Experimental test of birdcall detection by autonomous recorder units and by human observers using broadcast.
Castro I; De Rosa A; Priyadarshani N; Bradbury L; Marsland S
Ecol Evol; 2019 Mar; 9(5):2376-2397. PubMed ID: 30891187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bird species detection by an observer and an autonomous sound recorder in two different environments: Forest and farmland.
Kułaga K; Budka M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211970. PubMed ID: 30730984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Autonomous sound recording outperforms human observation for sampling birds: a systematic map and user guide.
Darras K; Batáry P; Furnas BJ; Grass I; Mulyani YA; Tscharntke T
Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01954. PubMed ID: 31206926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of environmental factors in birdsong acquisition using automated recorders.
Priyadarshani N; Castro I; Marsland S
Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(10):5016-5033. PubMed ID: 29876078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows.
Budka M; Jobda M; Szałański P; Piórkowski H
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266557. PubMed ID: 35395028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An annotated set of audio recordings of Eastern North American birds containing frequency, time, and species information.
Chronister LM; Rhinehart TA; Place A; Kitzes J
Ecology; 2021 Jun; 102(6):e03329. PubMed ID: 33705568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High microphone signal-to-noise ratio enhances acoustic sampling of wildlife.
Darras KFA; Deppe F; Fabian Y; Kartono AP; Angulo A; Kolbrek B; Mulyani YA; Prawiradilaga DM
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9955. PubMed ID: 33150056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the sampling effectiveness of acoustic recorder, camera trap and point count methods in sampling nocturnal birds in Afrotropical landscapes.
Joel YH; Iniunam IA; Dami DF; Ottosson U; Chaskda AA
Ecol Evol; 2024 May; 14(5):e11389. PubMed ID: 38774133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Observer-free experimental evaluation of habitat and distance effects on the detection of anuran and bird vocalizations.
MacLaren AR; Crump PS; Royle JA; Forstner MRJ
Ecol Evol; 2018 Dec; 8(24):12991-13003. PubMed ID: 30619599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic monitors and direct observations provide similar but distinct perspectives on bird assemblages in a lowland forest of eastern Ecuador.
Blake JG
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10565. PubMed ID: 33520440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities.
Rhinehart TA; Chronister LM; Devlin T; Kitzes J
Ecol Evol; 2020 Jul; 10(13):6794-6818. PubMed ID: 32724552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bird biodiversity assessments in temperate forest: the value of point count versus acoustic monitoring protocols.
Klingbeil BT; Willig MR
PeerJ; 2015; 3():e973. PubMed ID: 26038728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are minidisc recorders adequate for the study of respiratory sounds?
Kraman SS; Wodicka GR; Kiyokawa H; Pasterkamp H
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2002; 36(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12053867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic localization at large scales: a promising method for grey wolf monitoring.
Papin M; Pichenot J; Guérold F; Germain E
Front Zool; 2018; 15():11. PubMed ID: 29681989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of an acoustic location system to monitor Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) long calls.
Spillmann B; van Noordwijk MA; Willems EP; Mitra Setia T; Wipfli U; van Schaik CP
Am J Primatol; 2015 Jul; 77(7):767-76. PubMed ID: 25773926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust sound event detection in bioacoustic sensor networks.
Lostanlen V; Salamon J; Farnsworth A; Kelling S; Bello JP
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0214168. PubMed ID: 31647815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring spatial and temporal trends in the soundscape of an ecologically significant embayment.
Putland RL; Constantine R; Radford CA
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5713. PubMed ID: 28720760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft calls and broadcast calls in the corncrake as adaptations to short and long range communication.
Ręk P
Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():121-9. PubMed ID: 23876392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Soundscape dynamics of a cold protected forest: dominance of aircraft noise.
Grinfeder E; Haupert S; Ducrettet M; Barlet J; Reynet MP; Sèbe F; Sueur J
Landsc Ecol; 2022; 37(2):567-582. PubMed ID: 35035087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
