132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30891465)
1. Classification of breast microcalcifications using dual-energy mammography.
Ghammraoui B; Makeev A; Zidan A; Alayoubi A; Glick SJ
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jan; 6(1):013502. PubMed ID: 30891465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating the feasibility of classifying breast microcalcifications using photon-counting spectral mammography: A simulation study.
Ghammraoui B; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2304-2311. PubMed ID: 28332199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of breast microcalcifications with GaAs photon-counting spectral mammography using an inverse problem approach.
Ghammraoui B; Bader S; Thuering T; Glick SJ
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36716475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose.
Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Chen L; Altunbas MC; Liu X; Han T; Wang T; Yang WT; Whitman GJ; Tu SJ
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2995-3004. PubMed ID: 17822008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microcalcification detectability using a bench-top prototype photon-counting breast CT based on a Si strip detector.
Cho HM; Ding H; Barber WC; Iwanczyk JS; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4401-10. PubMed ID: 26133636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring CNN potential in discriminating benign and malignant calcifications in conventional and dual-energy FFDM: simulations and experimental observations.
Makeev A; Rodal G; Ghammraoui B; Badal A; Glick SJ
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2021 May; 8(3):033501. PubMed ID: 34002162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.
Ghani MU; Wong MD; Wu D; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Fuh J; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3523-3538. PubMed ID: 28379851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 12852535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography based on photon-counting detectors: A feasibility study.
Ding H; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3939-3951. PubMed ID: 28432828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of double layer filter on mean glandular dose (MGD) and image quality in low energy image of contrast enhanced spectral mammography (LE-CESM).
Niroshani HS; Nakamura T; Michiru N; Negishi T
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 34838440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis.
Cheung YC; Tsai HP; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Huang PC; Chen SC
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1082-9. PubMed ID: 26159872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.
Koukou V; Martini N; Michail C; Sotiropoulou P; Fountzoula C; Kalyvas N; Kandarakis I; Nikiforidis G; Fountos G
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():574238. PubMed ID: 26246848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fabrication of microcalcifications for insertion into phantoms used to evaluate x-ray breast imaging systems.
Ghammraoui B; Zidan A; Alayoubi A; Zidan A; Glick SJ
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34375962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
