These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30891663)

  • 1. A test of linguistic influences in the perceptual organization of speech.
    Freggens M; Thomas A; Pitt MA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1065-1075. PubMed ID: 30891663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preservation of categorical perception for speech in autism with and without speech onset delay.
    Chiodo L; Mottron L; Majerus S
    Autism Res; 2019 Nov; 12(11):1609-1622. PubMed ID: 31157957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.
    Jin P; Lu Y; Ding N
    Elife; 2020 Apr; 9():. PubMed ID: 32310082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language.
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2327-38. PubMed ID: 17471745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distal rhythm influences whether or not listeners hear a word in continuous speech: support for a perceptual grouping hypothesis.
    Morrill TH; Dilley LC; McAuley JD; Pitt MA
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 24457086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing speech sounds: top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception.
    Davis MH; Johnsrude IS
    Hear Res; 2007 Jul; 229(1-2):132-47. PubMed ID: 17317056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological Correlates of Speaker Segregation and Foreground-Background Selection in Ambiguous Listening Situations.
    Gandras K; Grimm S; Bendixen A
    Neuroscience; 2018 Oct; 389():19-29. PubMed ID: 28735101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of prominence by Estonian and English listeners.
    Lehiste I; Fox RA
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():419-34. PubMed ID: 1339921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.
    Heeren W; Coene M; Vaerenberg B; Avram A; Cardinaletti A; del Bo L; Pascu A; Volpato F; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Nov; 13(4):206-19. PubMed ID: 22449360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-stimulus EEG oscillations correlate with perceptual alternation of speech forms.
    Barraza P; Jaume-Guazzini F; Rodríguez E
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 May; 622():24-9. PubMed ID: 27105733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.
    Benson RR; Richardson M; Whalen DH; Lai S
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):342-53. PubMed ID: 16530428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Choi S; Hoover B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):483-94. PubMed ID: 17609611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.
    Coene M; Krijger S; Meeuws M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7249848. PubMed ID: 27830152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception.
    Samuel AG; Lieblich J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1479-90. PubMed ID: 24749935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of language experience and stimulus context on the neural organization and categorical perception of speech.
    Bidelman GM; Lee CC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():191-200. PubMed ID: 26146197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.