These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30891733)

  • 21. A PCE groundwater plume discharging to a river: influence of the streambed and near-river zone on contaminant distributions.
    Conant B; Cherry JA; Gillham RW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):249-79. PubMed ID: 15336797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to assess aquitard integrity.
    Parker BL; Cherry JA; Chapman SW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):197-230. PubMed ID: 15358493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of reactive well networks for remediating heterogeneous aquifers.
    Hudak PF
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2008 Jun; 43(7):731-7. PubMed ID: 18444075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Numerical study of variable-density flow and transport in unsaturated-saturated porous media.
    Liu Y; Kuang X; Jiao JJ; Li J
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Nov; 182():117-30. PubMed ID: 26379086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity and their implications on stream-aquifer interaction: a conceptual review.
    Naganna SR; Deka PC; Ch S; Hansen WF
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):24765-24789. PubMed ID: 28988330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Electron-Balance Based Approach to Predict the Decreasing Denitrification Potential of an Aquifer.
    Loschko M; Wöhling T; Rudolph DL; Cirpka OA
    Ground Water; 2019 Nov; 57(6):925-939. PubMed ID: 30934134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Numerical simulation of a natural gradient tracer experiment for the natural attenuation study: flow and physical transport.
    Julian HE; Boggs JM; Zheng C; Feehley CE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(4):534-45. PubMed ID: 11447854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identifying key controls on the behavior of an acidic-U(VI) plume in the Savannah River Site using reactive transport modeling.
    Bea SA; Wainwright H; Spycher N; Faybishenko B; Hubbard SS; Denham ME
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Aug; 151():34-54. PubMed ID: 23707874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Persistence of uranium groundwater plumes: contrasting mechanisms at two DOE sites in the groundwater-river interaction zone.
    Zachara JM; Long PE; Bargar J; Davis JA; Fox P; Fredrickson JK; Freshley MD; Konopka AE; Liu C; McKinley JP; Rockhold ML; Williams KH; Yabusaki SB
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Apr; 147():45-72. PubMed ID: 23500840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Numerical assessments of recharge-dominated groundwater flow and transport in the nearshore reclamation area in western Taiwan.
    Ni CF; Li WC; Hsu SM; Lee IH; Lin CP
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):83. PubMed ID: 30659403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling expected solute concentration in randomly heterogeneous flow systems with multicomponent reactions.
    Malmström ME; Destouni G; Martinet P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(9):2673-9. PubMed ID: 15180064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: Implications for contaminant transport.
    Medici G; West LJ; Banwart SA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Apr; 222():1-16. PubMed ID: 30795856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Small-Scale ASR Between Flow Barriers in a Saline Aquifer.
    van Ginkel M; des Tombe B; Olsthoorn T; Bakker M
    Ground Water; 2016 Nov; 54(6):840-850. PubMed ID: 27144471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the natural attenuation of organic contaminants in aquifers using plume-scale electron and carbon balances: model development with analysis of uncertainty and parameter sensitivity.
    Thornton SF; Lerner DN; Banwart SA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2001 Dec; 53(3-4):199-232. PubMed ID: 11820471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improved Domenico solution for three-dimensional contaminant transport.
    Sangani J; Srinivasan V
    J Contam Hydrol; 2021 Dec; 243():103897. PubMed ID: 34715622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating reaction rate coefficients within a travel-time modeling framework.
    Gong R; Lu C; Wu WM; Cheng H; Gu B; Watson D; Jardine PM; Brooks SC; Criddle CS; Kitanidis PK; Luo J
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 20132330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An Analytical Method for Assessing Recharge Using Groundwater Travel Time in Dupuit-Forchheimer Aquifers.
    Chesnaux R; Santoni S; Garel E; Huneau F
    Ground Water; 2018 Nov; 56(6):986-992. PubMed ID: 29732535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Delineation of three-dimensional well capture zones for complex multi-aquifer systems.
    Frind EO; Muhammad DS; Molson JW
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(6):586-98. PubMed ID: 12425346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitivity of solute advective travel time to porosities of hydrogeologic units.
    Zhu J; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB; Russell CE; Carroll RW; Shafer DS
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(3):442-7. PubMed ID: 20100293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reactive transport in the complex heterogeneous alluvial aquifer of Fortymile Wash, Nevada.
    Soltanian MR; Sun A; Dai Z
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 179():379-386. PubMed ID: 28390305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.