134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30892390)
1. Does the type of electrode affect the electromyoneurographic parameters in rats?1.
Somensi DN; Teixeira RKC; Feijó DH; Loureiro KD; Valente AL; Carvalho LTF; Calvo FC; Santos DRD; Barros RSM
Acta Cir Bras; 2019 Mar; 34(3):e201900304. PubMed ID: 30892390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conduction velocities of nerve fibers to smaller and larger muscles in rats.
Oğuzhanoğlu A; Erdoğan C; Tabak E; Cenikli U
Int J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 120(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 20128676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of the reference electrode on the compound muscle action potential of the flexor digiti minimi brevis.
Takahashi N; Robinson LR
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 89(7):570-5. PubMed ID: 20463563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of nerve conduction parameters in canine studies using recording needle and surface electrodes.
Crespo V; Liebel FX; Harcourt-Brown T
Vet J; 2020 Oct; 264():105534. PubMed ID: 33012442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials.
Wee AS; Ashley RA
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential.
Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE
Muscle Nerve; 2007 Jul; 36(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 17455266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials.
Ferdjallah M; Wertsch JJ; Harris GF
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface compound action potentials recorded from different locations on the anterior tibial muscle.
Wee AS
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Mar; 42(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 11938594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fibular motor nerve conduction studies: Investigating the mechanism for compound muscle action potential amplitude drop with proximal stimulation.
Kamel JT; Knight-Sadler RJ; Roberts LJ
Muscle Nerve; 2015 Dec; 52(6):993-6. PubMed ID: 25846267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound-guided needle positioning near the sciatic nerve to elicit compound muscle action potentials from the gastrocnemius muscle of the rat.
Nijhuis TH; Smits ES; van Neck JW; Visser GH; Walbeehm ET; Blok JH; Hovius SE
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Jan; 194(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 21074561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tibial motor nerve conduction studies: an investigation into the mechanism for amplitude drop of the proximal evoked response.
Barkhaus PE; Kincaid JC; Nandedkar SD
Muscle Nerve; 2011 Nov; 44(5):776-82. PubMed ID: 22006693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of standard and pediatric size concentric needle EMG electrodes.
Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 118(5):1162-5. PubMed ID: 17382584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of interelectrode distance on sural nerve action potential parameters.
Plastaras CT; Marciniak CM; Sipple DP; D'Amore KG; Garvan C; Zaman SM
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Mar; 87(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 18287816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Segmental analysis of motor conduction velocity in distal tracts of tibial nerve: a coaxial needle electrode study.
Troni W; Parino E; Pisani PC; Pisani G
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 19948425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diaphragm motor responses to phrenic nerve stimulation in ALS: Surface and needle recordings.
de Carvalho M; Pinto S; Swash M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Feb; 129(2):349-353. PubMed ID: 29288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of reference electrode position on the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) onset latency.
Phongsamart G; Wertsch JJ; Ferdjallah M; King JC; Foster DT
Muscle Nerve; 2002 Jun; 25(6):816-21. PubMed ID: 12115969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Needle electromyography.
Daube JR; Rubin DI
Muscle Nerve; 2009 Feb; 39(2):244-70. PubMed ID: 19145648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uni- and bipolar surface recording of human nerve responses.
Winkler T; Stålberg E; Haas LF
Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 2000104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of motor unit action potentials using monopolar vs. concentric needle electrodes in the middle deltoid and abductor digiti minimi muscles.
Nelson RM; Shedlock M; Kaczmarek C; Gahrs J; MacLaughlin H
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Dec; 43(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 14717026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
