These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30892615)

  • 21. Effects of maxillary expansion and protraction on pharyngeal airway dimensions in relation to changes in head posture and hyoid position : A retrospective cohort study.
    Çoban G; Öztürk T; Erdem ME; Kış HC; Yağcı A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Oct; 84(Suppl 3):172-185. PubMed ID: 36107225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Functional Mandibular Advancer in Class II division 1 treatment.
    Aras I; Pasaoglu A; Olmez S; Unal I; Tuncer AV; Aras A
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 27366817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Twin Block Therapy Versus Fixed Functional Appliances on Pharyngeal Airway Space in Skeletal Class II Patients: A Prospective Cephalometric Study.
    Kaur R; Garg AK; Gupta DK; Singla L; Aggarwal K
    Clin Ter; 2022; 173(4):306-315. PubMed ID: 35857047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in the upper airway, hyoid bone and craniofacial morphology between patients treated with headgear activator and Herbst appliance: A retrospective study on lateral cephalometry.
    Gu M; Savoldi F; Chan EYL; Tse CSK; Lau MTW; Wey MC; Hägg U; Yang Y
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Aug; 24(3):360-369. PubMed ID: 33217159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative study of the clinical effects of three different functional appliances on the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion].
    Song Y; Yu YL; Shen H; Zhang J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 26(4):406-8. PubMed ID: 18780501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects.
    Ghodke S; Utreja AK; Singh SP; Jena AK
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Dec; 15(1):68. PubMed ID: 25534004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of upper airway dimensional changes and hyoid position following mandibular advancement in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Sahoo NK; Jayan B; Ramakrishna N; Chopra SS; Kochar G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e623-7. PubMed ID: 23172501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative study of changes in the airway dimensions following the treatment of Class II malocclusion patients with the twin-block and Seifi appliances.
    Tahmasbi S; Seifi M; Soleymani AA; Mohamadian F; Alam M
    Dent Med Probl; 2023; 60(2):247-254. PubMed ID: 37382051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Orthopaedic treatment effects of functional therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in subjects with sleep-disordered breathing and Class II malocclusion.
    Pavoni C; Cretella Lombardo E; Lione R; Bollero P; Ottaviani F; Cozza P
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2017 Dec; 37(6):479-485. PubMed ID: 29327733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
    Mujagic M; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Katsaros C
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 32839142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.
    Kinzinger GSM; Lisson JA; Frye L; Gross U; Hourfar J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pharyngeal airway, hyoid bone, and soft palate changes after Class II treatment with Twin-block and Forsus appliances during the postpeak growth period.
    Baka ZM; Fidanboy M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Feb; 159(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 33388197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pharyngeal Airway Space and Hyoid Bone Positioning After Different Orthognathic Surgeries in Skeletal Class II Patients.
    Jiang C; Yi Y; Jiang C; Fang S; Wang J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 75(7):1482-1490. PubMed ID: 28351658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.
    Du X; Hägg U; Rabie AB
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12001553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance--a retrospective cephalometric study.
    Kinzinger G; Czapka K; Ludwig B; Glasl B; Gross U; Lisson J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Aug; 72(4):301-20. PubMed ID: 21898196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Radwan ES; Maher A; Montasser MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 37073934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.