These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30893476)

  • 1. Quantitative assessment of breast density using transmission ultrasound tomography.
    Wiskin J; Malik B; Natesan R; Lenox M
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2610-2620. PubMed ID: 30893476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):3988-97. PubMed ID: 18841850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography.
    Glide C; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 17388192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
    Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative Assessment of Breast Density: Transmission Ultrasound is Comparable to Mammography with Tomosynthesis.
    Natesan R; Wiskin J; Lee S; Malik BH
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2019 Dec; 12(12):871-876. PubMed ID: 31645343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
    Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
    Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast fat volume measurement using wide-bore 3 T MRI: comparison of traditional mammographic density evaluation with MRI density measurements using automatic segmentation.
    Petridou E; Kibiro M; Gladwell C; Malcolm P; Toms A; Juette A; Borga M; Dahlqvist Leinhard O; Romu T; Kasmai B; Denton E
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jul; 72(7):565-572. PubMed ID: 28363661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI.
    Niukkanen A; Arponen O; Nykänen A; Masarwah A; Sutela A; Liimatainen T; Vanninen R; Sudah M
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):425-434. PubMed ID: 29047034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical Note: Multipurpose CT, ultrasound, and MRI breast phantom for use in radiotherapy and minimally invasive interventions.
    Ruschin M; Davidson SR; Phounsy W; Yoo TS; Chin L; Pignol JP; Ravi A; McCann C
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2508. PubMed ID: 27147361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of realistic physical breast phantoms matched to virtual breast phantoms based on human subject data.
    Kiarashi N; Nolte AC; Sturgeon GM; Segars WP; Ghate SV; Nolte LW; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4116-26. PubMed ID: 26133612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative 3D breast magnetic resonance imaging fibroglandular tissue analysis and correlation with qualitative assessments: a feasibility study.
    Ha R; Mema E; Guo X; Mango V; Desperito E; Ha J; Wynn R; Zhao B
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2016 Apr; 6(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 27190766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast density analysis for whole breast ultrasound images.
    Chen JH; Huang CS; Chien KC; Takada E; Moon WK; Wu JH; Cho N; Wang YF; Chang RF
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4933-43. PubMed ID: 19994502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3-D Nonlinear Acoustic Inverse Scattering: Algorithm and Quantitative Results.
    Wiskin JW; Borup DT; Iuanow E; Klock J; Lenox MW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Aug; 64(8):1161-1174. PubMed ID: 28541199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.