These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30894130)

  • 21. Increasing response to a postal survey of sedentary patients - a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN45665423].
    Harrison RA; Cock D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 15537429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Canadian maternity experiences survey: design and methods.
    Dzakpasu S; Kaczorowski J; Chalmers B; Heaman M; Duggan J; Neusy E
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Mar; 30(3):207-216. PubMed ID: 18364098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring client experiences in maternity care under change: development of a questionnaire based on the WHO Responsiveness model.
    Scheerhagen M; van Stel HF; Birnie E; Franx A; Bonsel GJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117031. PubMed ID: 25671310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Access and quality of maternity care for disabled women during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period in England: data from a national survey.
    Malouf R; Henderson J; Redshaw M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e016757. PubMed ID: 28729324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized trial found online questionnaires supplemented by postal reminders generated a cost-effective and generalizable sample but don't forget the reminders.
    Loban A; Mandefield L; Hind D; Bradburn M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():116-125. PubMed ID: 28844786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.
    Edwards P; Roberts I; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Wentz R; Kwan I; Cooper R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000008. PubMed ID: 17443629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trends in response rates and respondent characteristics in five National Maternity Surveys in England during 1995-2018.
    Harrison S; Alderdice F; Henderson J; Redshaw M; Quigley MA
    Arch Public Health; 2020; 78():46. PubMed ID: 32509303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Funkhouser E; Vellala K; Baltuck C; Cacciato R; Durand E; McEdward D; Sowell E; Theisen SE; Gilbert GH;
    Eval Health Prof; 2017 Sep; 40(3):332-358. PubMed ID: 26755526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: randomised controlled trial.
    Sahlqvist S; Song Y; Bull F; Adams E; Preston J; Ogilvie D;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 May; 11():62. PubMed ID: 21548947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Means of increasing response rates in a Norwegian dietary survey among infants - results from a pseudo-randomized pilot study.
    Myhre JB; Andersen LF; Holvik K; Astrup H; Kristiansen AL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):144. PubMed ID: 31288751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of Web-Based Versus Paper-Based Questionnaires and Follow-Up Strategies on Participation Rates of Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Kilsdonk E; van Dulmen-den Broeder E; van der Pal HJ; Hollema N; Kremer LC; van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM; van Leeuwen FE; Jaspers MW; van den Berg MH
    JMIR Cancer; 2015 Nov; 1(2):e11. PubMed ID: 28410161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners' Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based Survey: A Randomized Trial.
    Sebo P; Maisonneuve H; Cerutti B; Fournier JP; Senn N; Haller DM
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e83. PubMed ID: 28330830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pilot study of methods for assessing unmet secondary health care need in New Zealand.
    Bagshaw P; Bagshaw S; Frampton C; Gauld R; Green T; Harris C; Hornblow A; Hudson B; Raymont A; Richardson A; Shaw C; Toop L
    N Z Med J; 2017 Mar; 130(1452):23-38. PubMed ID: 28337038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mixed contact methods to improve response to a postal questionnaire.
    Weston D; Parsons V; Ntani G; Rushton L; Madan I
    Occup Med (Lond); 2017 Jun; 67(4):305-307. PubMed ID: 28371932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of data obtained from service providers and service users to assess the quality of maternity care.
    Hundley V; Penney G; Fitzmaurice A; van Teijlingen E; Graham W
    Midwifery; 2002 Jun; 18(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 12139910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial.
    Lavelle K; Todd C; Campbell M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 May; 8():113. PubMed ID: 18507819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maternity waiting homes as part of a comprehensive approach to maternal and newborn care: a cross-sectional survey.
    Lori JR; Perosky J; Munro-Kramer ML; Veliz P; Musonda G; Kaunda J; Boyd CJ; Bonawitz R; Biemba G; Ngoma T; Scott N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jul; 19(1):228. PubMed ID: 31272402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experience with and amount of postpartum maternity care: Comparing women who rated the care they received from the maternity care assistant as 'good' or 'less than good care'.
    Baas CI; Wiegers TA; de Cock TP; Erwich JJHM; Spelten ER; Hutton EK
    Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():128-136. PubMed ID: 29024880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.