These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30895577)

  • 1. Duration of Operative Vaginal Delivery and Adverse Obstetric Outcomes.
    Miller ES; Lai Y; Bailit J; Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Leveno KJ; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Tita ATN; Saade GR; Sorokin Y; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Apr; 37(5):503-510. PubMed ID: 30895577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.
    Bailit JL; Grobman WA; Rice MM; Wapner RJ; Reddy UM; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Iams JD; Saade G; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):638.e1-638.e10. PubMed ID: 26596236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery.
    Muraca GM; Boutin A; Razaz N; Lisonkova S; John S; Ting JY; Scott H; Kramer MS; Joseph KS
    CMAJ; 2022 Jan; 194(1):E1-E12. PubMed ID: 35012946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor.
    Halscott TL; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Ramsey PS; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 26551186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery According to Fetal Head Station.
    Ducarme G; Hamel JF; Bouet PE; Legendre G; Vandenbroucke L; Sentilhes L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 126(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 26244539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position.
    Hirsch E; Elue R; Wagner A; Nelson K; Silver RK; Zhou Y; Adams MG
    J Perinatol; 2014 Dec; 34(12):898-900. PubMed ID: 24875411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Lurie S; Sadan O; Golan A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 16449136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
    Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complications of operative vaginal delivery and provider volume and experience.
    Yamasato K; Kimata C; Chern I; Clappier M; Burlingame J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(21):3568-3573. PubMed ID: 31744361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Association between the Number of Vacuum Pop-Offs and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes.
    Sakowicz A; Zahalka SJ; Miller ES
    Am J Perinatol; 2023 Feb; 40(3):274-278. PubMed ID: 33940648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity after attempted operative vaginal delivery.
    Panelli DM; Leonard SA; Joudi N; Girsen AI; Judy AE; El-Sayed YY; Gilbert WM; Lyell DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100339. PubMed ID: 33631384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Operative vaginal deliveries and their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes - prospective analysis.
    Morávková P; Hruban L; Jančářová D; Janků P; Gerychová R; Vinklerová P; Štěpánová R; Ventruba P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 31238678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operative vacuum vaginal delivery: effect of compliance with recommended checklist.
    Pintucci A; Consonni S; Lambicchi L; Vergani P; Incerti M; Bonati F; Locatelli A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 May; 34(10):1627-1633. PubMed ID: 31390914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choosing between bad, worse and worst: what is the preferred mode of delivery for failure of the second stage of labor?
    Hendler I; Kirshenbaum M; Barg M; Kees S; Mazaki-Tovi S; Moran O; Kalter A; Schiff E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug; 30(15):1861-1864. PubMed ID: 27550831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Caughey AB; Sandberg PL; Zlatnik MG; Thiet MP; Parer JT; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.