These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30897094)

  • 1. Kernel machine tests of association between brain networks and phenotypes.
    Jensen AM; Tregellas JR; Sutton B; Xing F; Ghosh D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0199340. PubMed ID: 30897094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatio-temporal modeling of connectome-scale brain network interactions via time-evolving graphs.
    Yuan J; Li X; Zhang J; Luo L; Dong Q; Lv J; Zhao Y; Jiang X; Zhang S; Zhang W; Liu T
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):350-369. PubMed ID: 29102809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dyconnmap: Dynamic connectome mapping-A neuroimaging python module.
    Marimpis AD; Dimitriadis SI; Goebel R
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(15):4909-4939. PubMed ID: 34250674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resting state dynamics meets anatomical structure: Temporal multiple kernel learning (tMKL) model.
    Surampudi SG; Misra J; Deco G; Bapi RS; Sharma A; Roy D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():609-620. PubMed ID: 30267857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics.
    He T; Kong R; Holmes AJ; Nguyen M; Sabuncu MR; Eickhoff SB; Bzdok D; Feng J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 206():116276. PubMed ID: 31610298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complementary contributions of concurrent EEG and fMRI connectivity for predicting structural connectivity.
    Wirsich J; Ridley B; Besson P; Jirsa V; Bénar C; Ranjeva JP; Guye M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():251-260. PubMed ID: 28842386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The parcellation-based connectome: limitations and extensions.
    de Reus MA; van den Heuvel MP
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 80():397-404. PubMed ID: 23558097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NBS-Predict: A prediction-based extension of the network-based statistic.
    Serin E; Zalesky A; Matory A; Walter H; Kruschwitz JD
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 244():118625. PubMed ID: 34610435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transient networks of spatio-temporal connectivity map communication pathways in brain functional systems.
    Griffa A; Ricaud B; Benzi K; Bresson X; Daducci A; Vandergheynst P; Thiran JP; Hagmann P
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():490-502. PubMed ID: 28412440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-scale cortical wiring space links cellular architecture and functional dynamics in the human brain.
    Paquola C; Seidlitz J; Benkarim O; Royer J; Klimes P; Bethlehem RAI; Larivière S; Vos de Wael R; Rodríguez-Cruces R; Hall JA; Frauscher B; Smallwood J; Bernhardt BC
    PLoS Biol; 2020 Nov; 18(11):e3000979. PubMed ID: 33253185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. System-level matching of structural and functional connectomes in the human brain.
    Osmanlıoğlu Y; Tunç B; Parker D; Elliott MA; Baum GL; Ciric R; Satterthwaite TD; Gur RE; Gur RC; Verma R
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():93-104. PubMed ID: 31141738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ANOVA approach for statistical comparisons of brain networks.
    Fraiman D; Fraiman R
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4746. PubMed ID: 29549369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimization of graph construction can significantly increase the power of structural brain network studies.
    Messaritaki E; Dimitriadis SI; Jones DK
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():495-511. PubMed ID: 31176831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrastive Brain Network Learning via Hierarchical Signed Graph Pooling Model.
    Tang H; Ma G; Guo L; Fu X; Huang H; Zhan L
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2024 Jun; 35(6):7363-7375. PubMed ID: 36374890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sparse Graphical Models for Functional Connectivity Networks: Best Methods and the Autocorrelation Issue.
    Zhu Y; Cribben I
    Brain Connect; 2018 Apr; 8(3):139-165. PubMed ID: 29634321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graph neural fields: A framework for spatiotemporal dynamical models on the human connectome.
    Aqil M; Atasoy S; Kringelbach ML; Hindriks R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1008310. PubMed ID: 33507899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian modeling of dependence in brain connectivity data.
    Chen S; Xing Y; Kang J; Kochunov P; Hong LE
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):269-286. PubMed ID: 30203093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional connectivity and structural covariance between regions of interest can be measured more accurately using multivariate distance correlation.
    Geerligs L; Cam-Can ; Henson RN
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():16-31. PubMed ID: 27114055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomy-Guided Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (AG-STGCNs) for Modeling Functional Connectivity Between Gyri and Sulci Across Multiple Task Domains.
    Jiang M; Chen Y; Yan J; Xiao Z; Mao W; Zhao B; Yang S; Zhao Z; Zhang T; Guo L; Becker B; Yao D; Kendrick KM; Jiang X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2024 Jun; 35(6):7435-7445. PubMed ID: 35930515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BrainNET: Inference of Brain Network Topology Using Machine Learning.
    Murugesan GK; Ganesh C; Nalawade S; Davenport EM; Wagner B; Kim WH; Maldjian JA
    Brain Connect; 2020 Oct; 10(8):422-435. PubMed ID: 33030350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.