These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30899012)

  • 1. Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability.
    Olszowy W; Aston J; Rua C; Williams GB
    Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):1220. PubMed ID: 30899012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Serial correlations in single-subject fMRI with sub-second TR.
    Bollmann S; Puckett AM; Cunnington R; Barth M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 166():152-166. PubMed ID: 29066396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the analysis of rapidly sampled fMRI data.
    Chen JE; Polimeni JR; Bollmann S; Glover GH
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():807-820. PubMed ID: 30735828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey of patient motion in disorders of consciousness and optimization of its retrospective correction.
    Hoffmann M; Carpenter TA; Williams GB; Sawiak SJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 33(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 25485789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-white noise in fMRI: does modelling have an impact?
    Lund TE; Madsen KH; Sidaros K; Luo WL; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 16099175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the impact of analysis software on task fMRI results.
    Bowring A; Maumet C; Nichols TE
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Aug; 40(11):3362-3384. PubMed ID: 31050106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of denoising pipelines in high temporal resolution task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Mayer AR; Ling JM; Dodd AB; Shaff NA; Wertz CJ; Hanlon FM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Sep; 40(13):3843-3859. PubMed ID: 31119818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Isolating the sources of pipeline-variability in group-level task-fMRI results.
    Bowring A; Nichols TE; Maumet C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Feb; 43(3):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 34773436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools.
    Oakes TR; Johnstone T; Ores Walsh KS; Greischar LL; Alexander AL; Fox AS; Davidson RJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):529-43. PubMed ID: 16099178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring predictive and reproducible modeling with the single-subject FIAC dataset.
    Chen X; Pereira F; Lee W; Strother S; Mitchell T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2006 May; 27(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 16565951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonstationary noise estimation in functional MRI.
    Long CJ; Brown EN; Triantafyllou C; Aharon I; Wald LL; Solo V
    Neuroimage; 2005 Dec; 28(4):890-903. PubMed ID: 16129625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.
    Ganzetti M; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
    Neuroinformatics; 2016 Jan; 14(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 26306865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate modeling of temporal correlations in rapidly sampled fMRI time series.
    Corbin N; Todd N; Friston KJ; Callaghan MF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Oct; 39(10):3884-3897. PubMed ID: 29885101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective degrees of freedom of the Pearson's correlation coefficient under autocorrelation.
    Afyouni S; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():609-625. PubMed ID: 31158478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How ignoring physiological noise can bias the conclusions from fMRI simulation results.
    Welvaert M; Rosseel Y
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Oct; 211(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 22960507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective motion correction in functional MRI.
    Zaitsev M; Akin B; LeVan P; Knowles BR
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 154():33-42. PubMed ID: 27845256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variance decomposition for single-subject task-based fMRI activity estimates across many sessions.
    Gonzalez-Castillo J; Chen G; Nichols TE; Bandettini PA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 154():206-218. PubMed ID: 27773827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model-based physiological noise removal in fast fMRI.
    Agrawal U; Brown EN; Lewis LD
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 205():116231. PubMed ID: 31589991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data.
    Woolrich MW; Ripley BD; Brady M; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1370-86. PubMed ID: 11707093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple but useful way to assess fMRI scan qualities.
    Power JD
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 154():150-158. PubMed ID: 27510328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.