These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30900099)

  • 1. The value of four imaging modalities in diagnosing lymph node involvement in rectal cancer: an overview and adjusted indirect comparison.
    Gao Y; Li J; Ma X; Wang J; Wang B; Tian J; Chen G
    Clin Exp Med; 2019 May; 19(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 30900099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endorectal ultrasonography for detecting lymph node involvement in patients with rectal cancer: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.
    Wang X; Gao Y; Li J; Wu J; Wang B; Ma X; Tian J; Shen M; Wang J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(43):e12899. PubMed ID: 30412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Assessment of lymph node status in rectal cancer by imaging].
    Wang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-3. PubMed ID: 27353097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hoshino N; Murakami K; Hida K; Sakamoto T; Sakai Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 30259217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography and computed tomography for restaging rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation.
    Huh JW; Park YA; Jung EJ; Lee KY; Sohn SK
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jul; 207(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18589355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
    Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis.
    de Jong EA; ten Berge JC; Dwarkasing RS; Rijkers AP; van Eijck CH
    Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 26619929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-Energy CT of Rectal Cancer Specimens: A CT-based Method for Mesorectal Lymph Node Characterization.
    Al-Najami I; Beets-Tan RG; Madsen G; Baatrup G
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jul; 59(7):640-7. PubMed ID: 27270516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy CT can detect malignant lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
    Al-Najami I; Lahaye MJ; Beets-Tan RGH; Baatrup G
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():81-88. PubMed ID: 28583651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of nodal involvement in primary rectal carcinoma without invasion to pelvic structures: accuracy of preoperative CT, MR, and DWIBS assessments relative to histopathologic findings.
    Zhou J; Zhan S; Zhu Q; Gong H; Wang Y; Fan D; Gong Z; Huang Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92779. PubMed ID: 24695111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Puli SR; Reddy JB; Bechtold ML; Choudhary A; Antillon MR; Brugge WR
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1255-65. PubMed ID: 19219506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anorectal staging: is EUS necessary?
    Cesmeli E
    Minerva Med; 2014 Oct; 105(5):423-36. PubMed ID: 25000219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Seow W; Vather R; Carneiro G; Moore JW; Sammour T
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1058. PubMed ID: 34565338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.
    Li XT; Zhang XY; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5333. PubMed ID: 27858916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Kim NK; Kim MJ; Yun SH; Sohn SK; Min JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1999 Jun; 42(6):770-5. PubMed ID: 10378601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative study of endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer].
    Guo F; Ren J; Wang S; Dai W; Ma N
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 94(17):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25142852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of N0 Irradiated Rectal Cancer Comparing MRI Before and After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.
    Pomerri F; Crimì F; Veronese N; Perin A; Lacognata C; Bergamo F; Boso C; Maretto I
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 28991083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EUS-FNA assessment of extramesenteric lymph node status in primary rectal cancer.
    Gleeson FC; Clain JE; Rajan E; Topazian MD; Wang KK; Levy MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Oct; 74(4):897-905. PubMed ID: 21839439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.