These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30900533)

  • 1. Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.
    Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 286(1899):20182535. PubMed ID: 30900533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing potential mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Peckenpaugh B; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Dec; 34(12):1970-1980. PubMed ID: 34653290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postcopulatory sexual selection generates speciation phenotypes in Drosophila.
    Manier MK; Lüpold S; Belote JM; Starmer WT; Berben KS; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Curr Biol; 2013 Oct; 23(19):1853-62. PubMed ID: 24076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species.
    Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Lüpold S; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23888856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraspecific sperm competition genes enforce post-mating species barriers in Drosophila.
    Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25355478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila.
    Price CS
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6643):663-6. PubMed ID: 9262398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in
    Davis JS; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 28116047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlated evolution of male and female reproductive traits drive a cascading effect of reinforcement in Drosophila yakuba.
    Comeault AA; Venkat A; Matute DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conspecific sperm precedence in sister species of Drosophila with overlapping ranges.
    Chang AS
    Evolution; 2004 Apr; 58(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 15154554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.
    Garlovsky MD; Yusuf LH; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 375(1813):20200071. PubMed ID: 33070721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila.
    Price CS; Kim CH; Posluszny J; Coyne JA
    Evolution; 2000 Dec; 54(6):2028-37. PubMed ID: 11209779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Anderson WW; Kim YK
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No evidence of conpopulation sperm precedence between allopatric populations of house mice.
    Firman RC; Simmons LW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e107472. PubMed ID: 25295521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila.
    Dixon SM; Coyne JA; Noor MA
    Mol Ecol; 2003 May; 12(5):1179-84. PubMed ID: 12694281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sperm performance in conspecific and heterospecific female fluid.
    Cramer ER; Stensrud E; Marthinsen G; Hogner S; Johannessen LE; Laskemoen T; Eybert MC; Slagsvold T; Lifjeld JT; Johnsen A
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Mar; 6(5):1363-77. PubMed ID: 26855769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experimental test of the evolutionary consequences of sympatry in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Jarvis WMC; Arthur NJ; Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2024 Feb; 78(3):555-565. PubMed ID: 38153840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetrical patterns of speciation uniquely support reinforcement in Drosophila.
    Yukilevich R
    Evolution; 2012 May; 66(5):1430-46. PubMed ID: 22519782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noisy neighbors can hamper the evolution of reproductive isolation by reinforcing selection.
    Matute DR
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):253-69. PubMed ID: 25616143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.