119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30901175)
21. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures.
Stolzenburg JU; Rabenalt R; DO M; Ho K; Dorschner W; Waldkirch E; Jonas U; Schütz A; Horn L; Truss MC
J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1271-5; discussion 1275. PubMed ID: 16145391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer.
Haab F; Boccon-Gibod L; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L; Toublanc M
Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 7530127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.
Papachristos A; Basto M; Te Marvelde L; Moon D
ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 24730750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique.
Su LM; Link RE; Bhayani SB; Sullivan W; Pavlovich CP
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 15245948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results.
Gaker DL; Steel BL
J Urol; 2004 Dec; 172(6 Pt 2):2549-52. PubMed ID: 15538205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable.
Lepor H; Nieder AM; Fraiman MC
Urology; 2001 Sep; 58(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 11549493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.
Gomez CA; Soloway MS; Civantos F; Hachiya T
Urology; 1993 Dec; 42(6):689-93; discussion 693-4. PubMed ID: 7504850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: a contemporary and anatomic approach.
Harris MJ; Thompson IM
Urology; 1996 Nov; 48(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 8911522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Full Neurovascular Sparing Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Our Experience with PERUSIA Technique.
Cochetti G; Boni A; Barillaro F; Pohja S; Cirocchi R; Mearini E
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):32-37. PubMed ID: 27824258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Robotic radical prostatectomy: overview of our learning curve].
Mavrich Villavicencio H; Esquena S; Palou Redorta J; Gómez Ruíz JJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2007 Jun; 31(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 17896554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Open radical prostatectomy reproducing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Involving antegrade nerve sparing and continuous anastomosis.
Kwon SY; Lee JN; Ha YS; Choi SH; Kim TH; Kwon TG
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(6):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 29039893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
Salomon L; Levrel O; Anastasiadis AG; Saint F; de La Taille A; Cicco A; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. da Vinci and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Analysis of Insurance Costs.
Niklas C; Saar M; Berg B; Steiner K; Janssen M; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
Urol Int; 2016; 96(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 26159050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up.
Bentas W; Wolfram M; Jones J; Bräutigam R; Kramer W; Binder J
Eur Urol; 2003 Aug; 44(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 12875935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Australian laparoscopic non robotic radical prostatectomy experience - analysis of 2943 cases (USANZ supplement).
Louie-Johnsun MW; Handmer MM; Calopedos RJ; Chabert C; Cohen RJ; Gianduzzo TR; Kearns PA; Moon DA; Ooi J; Shannon T; Sofield D; Tan AH
BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118 Suppl 3():43-48. PubMed ID: 27659257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Vesicourethral anastomosis including rhabdosphincter in retropubic radical prostatectomy: Technique and results.
Topaktaş R; Ürkmez A; Kutluhan MA; Başıbüyük İ; Önol ŞY
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jan; 90(4):249-253. PubMed ID: 30655634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of transperitoneal robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: single centre's experience.
Ihsan-Tasci A; Simsek A; Dogukan-Torer MB; Sokmen D; Sahin S; Bitkin A; Tugcu V
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Mar; 39(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 24856651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
