BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30902572)

  • 1. Liquid Calibration Phantoms in Ultra-Low-Dose QCT for the Assessment of Bone Mineral Density.
    Malekzadeh M; Abbasi-Rad S; Keyak JH; Nabil M; Asadi M; Mobini N; Naghdi P; Emadi H; Saligheh Rad H; Shiran MB
    J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):108-116. PubMed ID: 30902572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative micro-computed tomography: a non-invasive method to assess equivalent bone mineral density.
    Nazarian A; Snyder BD; Zurakowski D; Müller R
    Bone; 2008 Aug; 43(2):302-311. PubMed ID: 18539557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT.
    Van Hedent S; Su KH; Jordan DW; Eck B; Liang F; Kessner R; Kuo JW; Buls N; Klahr P; Ros P; Muzic RF
    J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):374-381. PubMed ID: 30497869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Novel Dipotassium Hydrogen Phosphate Phantom for Calibrating Computed Tomographic Bone Density Measurements in Birds.
    Poleschinski JM; Eley N; Enderlein D; Kramer M; Lierz M; Fischer D
    J Avian Med Surg; 2022 May; 36(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 35526162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and Validation of Synchronous QCT Calibration Phantom: Practical Methodology.
    Malekzadeh M; Abbasi-Rad S; Shahgholi M; Naghdi P; Hoseini MS; Yazdi NA; Shiran MB; Rad HS
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 50(1):157-162. PubMed ID: 30777238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of bone mineral density with dual energy quantitative computed tomography (DEQCT)].
    Ito M; Hayashi K; Yamada N
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):999-1008. PubMed ID: 2594490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved accuracy in the assessment of vertebral cortical thickness by quantitative computed tomography using the Iterative Convolution OptimizatioN (ICON) method.
    Damm T; Peña JA; Campbell GM; Bastgen J; Barkmann R; Glüer CC
    Bone; 2019 Mar; 120():194-203. PubMed ID: 30201318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved accuracy of cortical bone mineralization measured by polychromatic microcomputed tomography using a novel high mineral density composite calibration phantom.
    Deuerling JM; Rudy DJ; Niebur GL; Roeder RK
    Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):5138-45. PubMed ID: 20964233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative CT: a phantom study.
    Koch V; Hokamp NG; Albrecht MH; Gruenewald LD; Yel I; Borggrefe J; Wesarg S; Eichler K; Burck I; Gruber-Rouh T; Lenga L; Vogl TJ; Martin SS; Wichmann JL; Hammerstingl RM; Alizadeh LS; Mader C; Huizinga NA; D'Angelo T; Ascenti G; Mazziotti S; Booz C
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2021 Oct; 5(1):43. PubMed ID: 34608576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone Mineral Density Estimations From Routine Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study of Contrast and Calibration Effects.
    Kaesmacher J; Liebl H; Baum T; Kirschke JS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(2):217-223. PubMed ID: 27798444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative computed tomography: comparative study using different scanners with two calibration phantoms.
    Suzuki S; Yamamuro T; Okumura H; Yamamoto I
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1001-6. PubMed ID: 1742578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of bone mineral density measurement using dual-energy spectral CT and quantitative CT: a comparative phantom study.
    Li X; Li X; Li J; Jiao X; Jia X; Zhang X; Fan G; Yang J; Guo J
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Apr; 75(4):320.e9-320.e15. PubMed ID: 31882174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of bone-equivalent solution density in a thoracic spine phantom on bone single-photon emission computed tomography image quality and quantification.
    Matsutomo N; Fukami M; Yamamoto T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Jun; 16(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 36877399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine Coronary Calcium Scan Can Precisely Measure Vertebral Bone Density Without a Quantitative Calibration Phantom.
    Mao SS; Luo Y; Fischer H; Buodff MJ; Li D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 26529677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone mineral density measurements derived from dual-layer spectral CT enable opportunistic screening for osteoporosis.
    Roski F; Hammel J; Mei K; Baum T; Kirschke JS; Laugerette A; Kopp FK; Bodden J; Pfeiffer D; Pfeiffer F; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB; Gersing AS; Schwaiger BJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6355-6363. PubMed ID: 31115622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) derived Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in finite element studies: a review of the literature.
    Knowles NK; Reeves JM; Ferreira LM
    J Exp Orthop; 2016 Dec; 3(1):36. PubMed ID: 27943224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A calibration phantom system for QCT bone mineral density determination].
    Yan Q; Yan L; Yang DZ; San HB; Yan ZF
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 May; 29(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 16124621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A calibration methodology of QCT BMD for human vertebral body with registered micro-CT images.
    Dall'Ara E; Varga P; Pahr D; Zysset P
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2602-8. PubMed ID: 21776797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring bone mineral density with fat-water MRI: comparison with computed tomography.
    Ho KY; Hu HH; Keyak JH; Colletti PM; Powers CM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 37(1):237-42. PubMed ID: 22782698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.