These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30902780)

  • 1. Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Saadeh YS; Joseph JR; Smith BW; Kirsch MJ; Sabbagh AM; Park P
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1374-e1378. PubMed ID: 30902780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the early fate of adjacent segmental lordosis compensation at L3-4 and L5-S1 following a lateral versus transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5?
    Kim M; Kumar R; Drolet CE; Bs MA; Hanks T; Yamaguchi K; Krause K; Nemani VM; Leveque JC; Louie PK
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Sep; 33(9):3503-3508. PubMed ID: 38965087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two- Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery.
    Leveque JA; Drolet CE; Nemani V; Krause KL; Shen J; Rathore A; Baig Y; Louie PK
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e311-e317. PubMed ID: 35490888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Matsumoto T; Okuda S; Maeno T; Yamashita T; Yamasaki R; Sugiura T; Iwasaki M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):435-440. PubMed ID: 28059683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.
    Carlson BB; Saville P; Dowdell J; Goto R; Vaishnav A; Gang CH; McAnany S; Albert TJ; Qureshi S
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 30529420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity.
    Strong MJ; Yee TJ; Khalsa SSS; Saadeh YS; Swong KN; Kashlan ON; Szerlip NJ; Park P; Oppenlander ME
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E4. PubMed ID: 32871568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study.
    Kadam A; Wigner N; Saville P; Arlet V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):650-660. PubMed ID: 28960160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Maayan O; Subramanian T; Samuel AM; Shahi P; Vaishnav AS; Asada T; Amen TB; Tuma OC; Korsun MK; Singh N; Pajak A; Singh S; Araghi K; Sheha ED; Dowdell JE; Iyer S; Qureshi SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Oct; 41(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 39094190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expandable vs Static Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic Comparison of Segmental and Lumbar Sagittal Angles.
    Yee TJ; Joseph JR; Terman SW; Park P
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Jul; 81(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 28368542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Lordotic Cages Provide Better Segmental Lordosis Versus Nonlordotic Cages in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)?
    Sembrano JN; Horazdovsky RD; Sharma AK; Yson SC; Santos ERG; Polly DW
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 May; 30(4):E338-E343. PubMed ID: 28437335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Georg Schmorl Prize of the German Spine Society (DWG) 2017: correction of spino-pelvic alignment with relordosing mono- and bisegmental TLIF spondylodesis.
    Galla F; Wähnert D; Liljenqvist U
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Apr; 27(4):789-796. PubMed ID: 29417323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the fate of the adjacent segmental angles 6 months after single-level L3-4 or L4-5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion?
    Verst L; Drolet CE; Shen J; Leveque JA; Nemani VM; Varley ES; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2023 Jul; 23(7):982-989. PubMed ID: 36893919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.