These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30903003)

  • 1. Predicting the behavioural tendency of loss aversion.
    Zeng J; Wang Y; Zeng J; Cao Z; Chen H; Liu Y; Zhang Q; Su L
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):5024. PubMed ID: 30903003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unpleasant odors increase aversion to monetary losses.
    Stancak A; Xie Y; Fallon N; Bulsing P; Giesbrecht T; Thomas A; Pantelous AA
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Apr; 107():1-9. PubMed ID: 25711689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of loss aversion on neural responses to loss outcomes: An event-related potential study.
    Kokmotou K; Cook S; Xie Y; Wright H; Soto V; Fallon N; Giesbrecht T; Pantelous A; Stancak A
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():30-40. PubMed ID: 28396213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loss aversion and hypoxia: less loss aversion in oxygen-depleted environment.
    Pighin S; Bonini N; Savadori L; Hadjichristidis C; Schena F
    Stress; 2014 Mar; 17(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 24491066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amygdala signals subjective appetitiveness and aversiveness of mixed gambles.
    Gelskov SV; Henningsson S; Madsen KH; Siebner HR; Ramsøy TZ
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():81-90. PubMed ID: 25817710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.
    Tom SM; Fox CR; Trepel C; Poldrack RA
    Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5811):515-8. PubMed ID: 17255512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidental fear cues increase monetary loss aversion.
    Schulreich S; Gerhardt H; Heekeren HR
    Emotion; 2016 Apr; 16(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 26595436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural signatures of economic parameters during decision-making: a functional MRI (FMRI), electroencephalography (EEG) and autonomic monitoring study.
    Minati L; Grisoli M; Franceschetti S; Epifani F; Granvillano A; Medford N; Harrison NA; Piacentini S; Critchley HD
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Jan; 25(1):73-96. PubMed ID: 22101380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human scalp potentials reflect a mixture of decision-related signals during perceptual choices.
    Philiastides MG; Heekeren HR; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 34(50):16877-89. PubMed ID: 25505339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity.
    Wang L; Zheng J; Huang S; Sun H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2015; 2015():108417. PubMed ID: 26539213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity of the brain to loss aversion during risky gambles.
    Dreher JC
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jul; 11(7):270-2. PubMed ID: 17556011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotion-induced loss aversion and striatal-amygdala coupling in low-anxious individuals.
    Charpentier CJ; De Martino B; Sim AL; Sharot T; Roiser JP
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 11(4):569-79. PubMed ID: 26589451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychological mechanisms of loss aversion: A drift-diffusion decomposition.
    Zhao WJ; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101331. PubMed ID: 32777328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Acceptance of Mixed Gambles Is Sensitive to the Range of Gains and Losses Experienced, and "Estimates of Lambda (k) Are Not a Reliable Measure of Loss Aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2021)": Correction.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jan; 151(1):160. PubMed ID: 35238600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-Related Potentials Are Associated With Unexpected Gain and Loss: Using a Gambling Paradigm.
    Krause D; Jobst A; Langemak SM; Keeser D; Chrobok AI; Langgartner S; Adorjan K; Gertzen M; Pogarell O; Karch S
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2019 May; 50(3):154-160. PubMed ID: 30477341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.
    Cherkasova MV; Clark L; Barton JJS; Schulzer M; Shafiee M; Kingstone A; Stoessl AJ; Winstanley CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(48):10362-10370. PubMed ID: 30373765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Schurger A; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jul; 14(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15054053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.
    Oliver A
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2219-29. PubMed ID: 15047079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptance of mixed gambles is sensitive to the range of gains and losses experienced, and estimates of lambda (λ) are not a reliable measure of loss aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2020).
    Walasek L; Mullett TL; Stewart N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2666-2670. PubMed ID: 35025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aberrant neural signatures of decision-making: Pathological gamblers display cortico-striatal hypersensitivity to extreme gambles.
    Gelskov SV; Madsen KH; Ramsøy TZ; Siebner HR
    Neuroimage; 2016 Mar; 128():342-352. PubMed ID: 26780575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.