These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904273)

  • 1. Image Perception and Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mammography: An Editorial.
    Zou KH; Evers K
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):724-725. PubMed ID: 30904273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current state of digital mammography.
    Shiraishi A
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 18365303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study.
    Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 24450665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography.
    Paquelet JR; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W115-8. PubMed ID: 20028882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspective on digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M
    Semin Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 36(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 11475066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Digital mammography: experiences in its clinical application].
    Schönhofen H; Arnold W; Hess T; Allgayer B
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9711282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic digital mammography in Japan: issues to consider.
    Uematsu T
    Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):180-2. PubMed ID: 20082161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Update in digital mammography.
    Hogge JP; Artz DS; Freedman MT
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997; 38(1):89-113. PubMed ID: 9063622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.
    Cole E; Pisano ED; Brown M; Kuzmiak C; Braeuning MP; Kim HH; Jong R; Walsh R
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86. PubMed ID: 15288038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology.
    Pisano ED; Gatsonis CA; Yaffe MJ; Hendrick RE; Tosteson AN; Fryback DG; Bassett LW; Baum JK; Conant EF; Jong RA; Rebner M; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):404-12. PubMed ID: 15961755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Soft copy versus hard copy findings in digital mammography].
    Funke M; Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 12063733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of a fully integrated digital screening mammography program in the Vienne region].
    Pluvinage A; Morin C; Devineau L; Migeot V; Coste D; Jouhanneaud A; Tasu JP
    J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 90(12):1837-42. PubMed ID: 20032826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital mammography: are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees AV
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 18342763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital mammography: a review of technical development and clinical applications.
    Shah AJ; Wang J; Yamada T; Fajardo LL
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2003 Apr; 4(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12744760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Muller S; Mathieu MC; Rochard F; Opolon P; Sigal R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W528-37. PubMed ID: 17056886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.