These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904273)

  • 21. The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance.
    Cole EB; Pisano ED; Zeng D; Muller K; Aylward SR; Park S; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Walsh R; Baker J; Gimenez EI; Freimanis R
    Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):585-95. PubMed ID: 15866131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The diagnostic accuracy of a digital mammography system with photostimulable storage phosphors used with automatic reading].
    Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; De Gaspari A; Tacchini S; Camalori M; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):46-51. PubMed ID: 8614730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression.
    Avrin D; Morin R; Piraino D; Rowberg A; Detorie N; Zuley M; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 17412135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jan; 198(1):240. PubMed ID: 22194503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Storage phosphor digital mammography.
    Hogge JP; Freedman MT
    Semin Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 32(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 9035278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital mammography: an update.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The breast cancer diagnosis accuracy of the digital breast tomosynthesis technique].
    Zhang HW; Li JT; Lü MH; Qin L; Li LF; Cui SD; Liu H
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 97(18):1387-1390. PubMed ID: 28535623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [DR (a-Se) versus CR (DLR)--is an improvement of the accuracy possible? A retrospective histologic analysis (n = 100)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2007; 56(4):129-35. PubMed ID: 17390952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The current status of digital mammography.
    James JJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Jan; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14697370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Michell MJ; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Evans DR; Peacock C; Lawinski CP; Douiri A; Wilson R; Whelehan P
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Oct; 67(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 22625656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
    Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A review of the scientific evidence concerning the clinical application of digital mammography].
    Carreira Gómez C; Martínez Cantarero J; Gómez Santos D; Polanco Sánchez C; Naranjo García P; del Llano Señarís J
    Radiologia; 2007; 49(3):145-56. PubMed ID: 17524330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Digital mammography].
    Levy L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Oct; 31(10):856-66. PubMed ID: 14642945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital mammography workflow.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(3):245M-60M. PubMed ID: 21209426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Current status of digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1996 Oct; 17(5):424-43. PubMed ID: 8896109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
    Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital mammography: state of the art.
    Gater L
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 73(5):445-57; quiz 458-60. PubMed ID: 12048983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Moving into the digital era: a novel experience with the first full-field digital mammography system in Malaysia.
    Ranganathan S; Faridah Y; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2007 Sep; 48(9):804-7. PubMed ID: 17728959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.