101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904568)
1. Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study.
Jenniskens K; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():1-10. PubMed ID: 30904568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of uncertainty in patient classification on diagnostic performance estimations.
McHugh LC; Snyder K; Yager TD
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217146. PubMed ID: 31116772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification.
Alonzo TA; Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1852-64. PubMed ID: 21495059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
Collins J; Huynh M
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
Albert PS
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions.
Nieuwenhuis LL; Hermans FJ; Bij de Vaate AJM; Leeflang MM; Brölmann HA; Hehenkamp WJ; Mol BWJ; Clark TJ; Huirne JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011126. PubMed ID: 28472862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods.
Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Estimation by the Hui and Walter method of the sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic test in the absence of a reference test: results of a simulation study].
Bertrand P; Benichou J; Chastang C
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(6):502-11. PubMed ID: 7816963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Methodological bias and variation of systematic reviews on diagnostic test accuracy].
Li ZX; Yang ZR; Xiang X; Gao P; Shu Z; Huang YS; Cao Y; Sun F; Zhan SY
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 37(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 26917532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extending Hui-Walter framework to correlated outcomes with application to diagnosis tests of an eye disease among premature infants.
Liu YL; Ying GS; Quinn GE; Zhou XH; Chen Y
Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):433-448. PubMed ID: 34859902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Verification and classification bias interactions in diagnostic test accuracy studies for fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Schmidt RL; Walker BS; Cohen MB
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Mar; 123(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 25521425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
