These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904568)

  • 61. Diagnostic accuracy of reference change values.
    Lyon AW
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2022 Jul; 82(4):341. PubMed ID: 35616149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Conjoint measurement of disorder prevalence, test sensitivity, and test specificity: notes on Botella, Huang, and Suero's multinomial model.
    Erdfelder E; Moshagen M
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():876. PubMed ID: 24319439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Extreme uncertainty and unquantifiable bias do not inform population sizes.
    Robinson OJ; Socolar JB; Stuber EF; Auer T; Berryman AJ; Boersch-Supan PH; Brightsmith DJ; Burbidge AH; Butchart SHM; Davis CL; Dokter AM; Di Giacomo AS; Farnsworth A; Fink D; Hochachka WM; Howell PE; La Sorte FA; Lees AC; Marsden S; Martin R; Martin RO; Masello JF; Miller ET; Moodley Y; Musgrove A; Noble DG; Ojeda V; Quillfeldt P; Royle JA; Ruiz-Gutierrez V; Tella JL; Yorio P; Youngflesh C; Johnston A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Mar; 119(10):e2113862119. PubMed ID: 35238655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Challenges of Implementing the Clinical Data Standards.
    Tempe DK; Neema PK
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2020 Nov; 34(11):2881-2883. PubMed ID: 32593585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Host biomarkers and combinatorial scores for the detection of serious and invasive bacterial infection in pediatric patients with fever without source.
    Lacroix L; Papis S; Mardegan C; Luterbacher F; L'Huillier A; Sahyoun C; Keitel K; Mastboim N; Etshtein L; Shani L; Simon E; Barash E; Navon R; Gottlieb TM; Oved K; Eden E; Combescure C; Galetto-Lacour A; Gervaix A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294032. PubMed ID: 37956117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Biomarkers as Prognostic Predictors and Therapeutic Guide in Critically Ill Patients: Clinical Evidence.
    Méndez Hernández R; Ramasco Rueda F
    J Pers Med; 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36836567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Machine learning prediction of postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events in geriatric patients: a prospective cohort study.
    Peng X; Zhu T; Wang T; Wang F; Li K; Hao X
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):284. PubMed ID: 36088288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Development of a clinical prediction rule for sepsis in primary care: protocol for the TeSD-IT study.
    Loots FJ; Hopstaken R; Jenniskens K; Frederix GWJ; van de Pol AC; Van den Bruel A; Oosterheert JJ; van Zanten ARH; Smits M; Verheij TJM
    Diagn Progn Res; 2020; 4():12. PubMed ID: 32775698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
    Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effect of uncertainty in patient classification on diagnostic performance estimations.
    McHugh LC; Snyder K; Yager TD
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217146. PubMed ID: 31116772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
    Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study.
    Jenniskens K; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():1-10. PubMed ID: 30904568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.