These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904568)

  • 81. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
    Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Development of practical recommendations for diagnostic accuracy studies in low-prevalence situations.
    Holtman GA; Berger MY; Burger H; Deeks JJ; Donner-Banzhoff N; Fanshawe TR; Koshiaris C; Leeflang MM; Oke JL; Perera R; Reitsma JB; Van den Bruel A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 114():38-48. PubMed ID: 31150837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.
    Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Coomarasamy A; Khan KS; Bossuyt PM
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(50):iii, ix-51. PubMed ID: 18021577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Observed differences in diagnostic test accuracy between patient subgroups: is it real or due to reference standard misclassification?
    Biesheuvel C; Irwig L; Bossuyt P
    Clin Chem; 2007 Oct; 53(10):1725-9. PubMed ID: 17885138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown.
    Enøe C; Georgiadis MP; Johnson WO
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):61-81. PubMed ID: 10802334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study.
    Jenniskens K; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():1-10. PubMed ID: 30904568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J; Huynh M
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
    de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 5.