These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904615)

  • 1. Modeling the length effect for words in lexical decision: The role of visual attention.
    Ginestet E; Phénix T; Diard J; Valdois S
    Vision Res; 2019 Jun; 159():10-20. PubMed ID: 30904615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Length effect in reading and lexical decision: evidence from skilled readers and a developmental dyslexic participant.
    Juphard A; Carbonnel S; Valdois S
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 15177808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atypical viewing position effect in developmental dyslexia: A behavioural and modelling investigation.
    Valdois S; Phénix T; Fort M; Diard J
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2021 Jul; 38(5):319-335. PubMed ID: 34818988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual attention modulates the transition from fine-grained, serial processing to coarser-grained, more parallel processing: A computational modeling study.
    Steinhilber A; Diard J; Ginestet E; Valdois S
    Vision Res; 2023 Jun; 207():108211. PubMed ID: 36990012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.
    Kang SH; Yap MJ; Tse CS; Kurby CA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 21644189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process.
    Norris D
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):327-57. PubMed ID: 16637764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polysyllabic pseudo-word processing in reading and lexical decision: converging evidence from behavioral data, connectionist simulations and functional MRI.
    Valdois S; Carbonnel S; Juphard A; Baciu M; Ans B; Peyrin C; Segebarth C
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1085(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 16574082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
    Acha J; Perea M
    Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition.
    Ventura P; Fernandes T; Pereira A; Guerreiro JC; Farinha-Fernandes A; Delgado J; Ferreira MF; Faustino B; Raposo I; Wong AC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2739-2750. PubMed ID: 32077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonemic feature involvement in lexical access in grades 3 and 5: Evidence from visual and auditory lexical decision tasks.
    Sauval K; Perre L; Casalis S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():212-219. PubMed ID: 29258652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2000-2017. PubMed ID: 31832892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A delay in processing for repeated letters: Evidence from megastudies.
    Trifonova IV; Adelman JS
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():227-241. PubMed ID: 31005639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. I see/hear what you mean: semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 24099578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.