These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904667)

  • 21. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
    Knoppers BM; Joly Y; Simard J; Durocher F
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 14(11):1170-8. PubMed ID: 16868560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants.
    Miller FA; Christensen R; Giacomini M; Robert JS
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 18316466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative.
    Fernandez CV; Kodish E; Weijer C
    IRB; 2003; 25(3):12-9. PubMed ID: 14569989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of VUS reporting, variant reinterpretation and recontact policies in clinical genomic sequencing consent forms.
    Vears DF; Niemiec E; Howard HC; Borry P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Dec; 26(12):1743-1751. PubMed ID: 30143804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consent Is the Cornerstone of Ethically Valid Research: Ethical Issues in Recontacting Subjects Who Enrolled in Research as a Minor.
    Paquette ET; Ross LF
    Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(10):61-3. PubMed ID: 26479111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: disclosing individual results of genetic research.
    Manolio TA
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):32-4; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Expanding the physician's duty of care: a duty to recontact?
    Letendre M; Godard B
    Med Law; 2004; 23(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 15532946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers.
    Fitzpatrick J; Hahn C; Costa T; Huggins M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Oct; 61(4):A57. PubMed ID: 11644972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?
    Budin-Ljøsne I; Mascalzoni D; Soini S; Machado H; Kaye J; Bentzen HB; Rial-Sebbag E; D'Abramo F; Witt M; Schamps G; Katić V; Krajnovic D; Harris JR
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2016 Jun; 14(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 27082461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recontacting patients for multigene panel testing in hereditary cancer: Efficacy and insights.
    Sawyer L; Creswick H; Lewandowski R; Quillin J
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Dec; 28(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 31553108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Staying informed and recontacting patients about research advances: a study of patient attitudes.
    Huggins M; Hahn C; Costa T
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Oct; 59(4):A335. PubMed ID: 11644832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethics in population-based genetic research.
    DeCamp M; Sugarman J
    Account Res; 2004; 11(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 15341044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Duty to recontact in genomic cancer care: A tool helping to assess the professional's responsibility.
    Ploem MC; Giesbertz NAA; Bredenoord AL; Retèl VP; van Harten WH
    Eur J Cancer; 2023 Jun; 186():22-26. PubMed ID: 37028199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
    Hens K; Nys H; Cassiman JJ; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Mar; 37(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 21059631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials.
    Wolf LE; Lo B
    IRB; 2004; 26(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 15449408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dementias Platform UK Clinical Studies and Great Minds Register: protocol of a targeted brain health studies recontact database.
    Koychev I; Young S; Holve H; Ben Yehuda M; Gallacher J
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e040766. PubMed ID: 33247021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants.
    Shalowitz DI; Miller FG
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Sep; 34(9):e17. PubMed ID: 18757617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Regarding the duty of care of a general practitioner for a continuously increasing, elevated PSA level (OLG Koblenz, decision dated 18 June 2015 - 5 U 66/15)].
    Dahm FJ
    Urologe A; 2016 Jul; 55(7):949-51. PubMed ID: 27335093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
    Fernandez CV; Weijer C
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):44-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.