313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904701)
1. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which screening strategy should be offered to women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations? A simulation of comparative cost-effectiveness.
de Bock GH; Vermeulen KM; Jansen L; Oosterwijk JC; Siesling S; Dorrius MD; Feenstra T; Houssami N; Greuter MJ
Br J Cancer; 2013 Apr; 108(8):1579-86. PubMed ID: 23579217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
Cott Chubiz JE; Lee JM; Gilmore ME; Kong CY; Lowry KP; Halpern EF; McMahon PM; Ryan PD; Gazelle GS
Cancer; 2013 Mar; 119(6):1266-76. PubMed ID: 23184400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of MRI for breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Pataky R; Armstrong L; Chia S; Coldman AJ; Kim-Sing C; McGillivray B; Scott J; Wilson CM; Peacock S
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():339. PubMed ID: 23837641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.
Griebsch I; Brown J; Boggis C; Dixon A; Dixon M; Easton D; Eeles R; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Hawnaur J; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Potterton J; Thompson D; Turnbull LW; Walker LG; Warren R; Leach MO;
Br J Cancer; 2006 Oct; 95(7):801-10. PubMed ID: 17016484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Mastectomy versus Surveillance in BRCA Mutation Carriers with a History of Ovarian Cancer.
Gamble C; Havrilesky LJ; Myers ER; Chino JP; Hollenbeck S; Plichta JK; Kelly Marcom P; Shelley Hwang E; Kauff ND; Greenup RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(11):3116-3123. PubMed ID: 28699130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.
Manchanda R; Patel S; Gordeev VS; Antoniou AC; Smith S; Lee A; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ; Turnbull C; Ramus SJ; Gayther SA; Pharoah PDP; Menon U; Jacobs I; Legood R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Jul; 110(7):714-725. PubMed ID: 29361001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relevance and efficacy of breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers above 60 years: a national cohort study.
Saadatmand S; Vos JR; Hooning MJ; Oosterwijk JC; Koppert LB; de Bock GH; Ausems MG; van Asperen CJ; Aalfs CM; Gómez Garcia EB; Meijers-Heijboer H; Hoogerbrugge N; Piek M; Seynaeve C; Verhoef C; Rookus M; Tilanus-Linthorst MM;
Int J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 135(12):2940-9. PubMed ID: 24789418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for risk-stratified screening in women with BRCA mutations or high familial risk for breast cancer: are we there yet?
Whitaker KD; Sheth D; Olopade OI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 32621252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.
Manchanda R; Legood R; Burnell M; McGuire A; Raikou M; Loggenberg K; Wardle J; Sanderson S; Gessler S; Side L; Balogun N; Desai R; Kumar A; Dorkins H; Wallis Y; Chapman C; Taylor R; Jacobs C; Tomlinson I; Beller U; Menon U; Jacobs I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jan; 107(1):380. PubMed ID: 25435542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Multigene Test Could Cost-Effectively Help Extend Life Expectancy for Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer.
Li Y; Arellano AR; Bare LA; Bender RA; Strom CM; Devlin JJ
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 28407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of abbreviated-protocol MRI screening for women with mammographically dense breasts in a national breast cancer screening program.
Wang J; Greuter MJW; Vermeulen KM; Brokken FB; Dorrius MD; Lu W; de Bock GH
Breast; 2022 Feb; 61():58-65. PubMed ID: 34915447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer detection and tumor characteristics in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Krammer J; Pinker-Domenig K; Robson ME; Gönen M; Bernard-Davila B; Morris EA; Mangino DA; Jochelson MS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 163(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 28343309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Annual screening strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: a comparative effectiveness analysis.
Lowry KP; Lee JM; Kong CY; McMahon PM; Gilmore ME; Cott Chubiz JE; Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Gazelle GS
Cancer; 2012 Apr; 118(8):2021-30. PubMed ID: 21935911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.
van Zelst JCM; Mus RDM; Woldringh G; Rutten MJCM; Bult P; Vreemann S; de Jong M; Karssemeijer N; Hoogerbrugge N; Mann RM
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):376-388. PubMed ID: 28609204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
