218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30904706)
1. Importance of Technique, Target Selection, Contouring, Dose Prescription, and Dose-Planning in External Beam Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Evolution of Practice From EMBRACE-I to II.
Berger T; Seppenwoolde Y; Pötter R; Assenholt MS; Lindegaard JC; Nout RA; de Leeuw A; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Tan LT; Georg D; Kirisits C; Dumas I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Fokdal L; Tanderup K;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(4):885-894. PubMed ID: 30904706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Implementation of "Plan of the Day" Strategy in Definitive Radiation Therapy of Cervical Cancer: Online Adaptation to Address the Challenge of Organ Filling Reproducibility.
Ghosh S; Gurram L; Kumar A; Mulye G; Mittal P; Chopra S; Kharbanda D; Hande V; Ghadi Y; Scaria L; Dheera A; Varghese GB; Kole S; Ansari S; Mahantshetty U; Agarwal JP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Mar; 118(3):605-615. PubMed ID: 37816473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose-Volume Effects and Risk Factors for Late Diarrhea in Cervix Cancer Patients After Radiochemotherapy With Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy in the EMBRACE I Study.
K Jensen NB; Pötter R; Spampinato S; Fokdal LU; Chargari C; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP; Sturdza A; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Mahantshetty U; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Hoskin P; Rai B; Wiebe E; Cooper R; Van der Steen-Banasik E; Van Limbergen E; Sundset M; Pieters BR; Nout RA; Kirisits C; Kirchheiner K; Tanderup K;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2021 Mar; 109(3):688-700. PubMed ID: 33068689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early clinical outcome of coverage probability based treatment planning for simultaneous integrated boost of nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Lindegaard JC; Assenholt M; Ramlov A; Fokdal LU; Alber M; Tanderup K
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1479-1486. PubMed ID: 28849684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of training in external beam treatment planning for locally advanced cervix cancer: Report from the EMBRACE II dummy run.
Seppenwoolde Y; Assenholt MS; Georg D; Nout R; Tan LT; Rumpold T; de Leeuw A; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Kirisits C; Pötter R; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K;
Radiother Oncol; 2019 Apr; 133():149-155. PubMed ID: 30935571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity modulated proton beam radiation for brachytherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Clivio A; Kluge A; Cozzi L; Köhler C; Neumann O; Vanetti E; Wlodarczyk W; Marnitz S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 24119834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early morbidity and dose-volume effects in definitive radiochemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective cohort study covering modern treatment techniques.
Seppenwoolde Y; Majercakova K; Buschmann M; Dörr E; Sturdza AE; Schmid MP; Pötter R; Georg D
Strahlenther Onkol; 2021 Jun; 197(6):505-519. PubMed ID: 33929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.
Chan P; Yeo I; Perkins G; Fyles A; Milosevic M
Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():13. PubMed ID: 16722546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of nodal coverage utilizing image guided radiation therapy for primary gynecologic tumor volumes.
Ahmed F; Sarkar V; Gaffney DK; Salter B; Poppe MM
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 26994828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image-guided radiotherapy for cervix cancer: high-tech external beam therapy versus high-tech brachytherapy.
Georg D; Kirisits C; Hillbrand M; Dimopoulos J; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1272-8. PubMed ID: 18495372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 45 or 50 Gy, Which is the Optimal Radiotherapy Pelvic Dose in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Perspective of Reaching Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Adaptive Brachytherapy Planning Aims?
Mazeron R; Petit C; Rivin E; Limkin E; Dumas I; Maroun P; Annede P; Martinetti F; Seisen T; Lefkopoulos D; Chargari C; Haie-Meder C
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 26547694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility study of toxicity outcomes using GEC-ESTRO contouring guidelines on CT based instead of MRI-based planning in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.
Koh V; Choo BA; Lee KM; Tan TH; Low JH; Ng SY; Ilancheran A; Shen L; Tang J
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 27816539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Validation of a High Dimensional Shape Model for Organ Motion in Intact Cervical Cancer.
Williamson CW; Green G; Noticewala SS; Li N; Shen H; Vaida F; Mell LK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(4):801-807. PubMed ID: 27788953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CBCT-guided evolutive library for cervical adaptive IMRT.
Rigaud B; Simon A; Gobeli M; Lafond C; Leseur J; Barateau A; Jaksic N; Castelli J; Williaume D; Haigron P; De Crevoisier R
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1379-1390. PubMed ID: 29453893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT.
Heijkoop ST; Langerak TR; Quint S; Bondar L; Mens JW; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Nov; 90(3):673-9. PubMed ID: 25151538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of treatment plan quality between Tri-Co-60 intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for cervical cancer.
Park JM; Park SY; Kim JI; Kang HC; Choi CH
Phys Med; 2017 Aug; 40():11-16. PubMed ID: 28760506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
