133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30905394)
1. A biological or a synthetic mesh in immediate breast reconstruction? A cohort-study of long-term Health related Quality of Life (HrQoL).
Hallberg H; Elander A; Kölby L; Hansson E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1812-1816. PubMed ID: 30905394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hallberg H; Rafnsdottir S; Selvaggi G; Strandell A; Samuelsson O; Stadig I; Svanberg T; Hansson E; Lewin R
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Jun; 52(3):130-147. PubMed ID: 29320921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: A randomized controlled study.
Hansson E; Edvinsson AC; Elander A; Kölby L; Hallberg H
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 123(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33051871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Schrenk P; Bjelic-Radisic V; Unterrieder K; Leser C; Fink-Retter A; Salama M; Singer C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 42(5):665-71. PubMed ID: 26947961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the use of biological and synthetic meshes in one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.
Gao P; Wang X; Bai P; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
Breast Cancer; 2022 May; 29(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 34978672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TIGR
Hallberg H; Lewin R; Elander A; Hansson E
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Aug; 52(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 29874964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of inflammatory response and synovial metaplasia in immediate breast reconstruction with a synthetic and a biological mesh: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Hansson E; Burian P; Hallberg H
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2020 Jun; 54(3):131-136. PubMed ID: 31859575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are patients most satisfied with a synthetic or a biological mesh in dual-plane immediate breast reconstruction after 5 years? A randomized controlled trial comparing the two meshes in the same patient.
Paganini A; Meyer S; Hallberg H; Hansson E
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4133-4143. PubMed ID: 36154981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy.
Krueger EA; Wilkins EG; Strawderman M; Cederna P; Goldfarb S; Vicini FA; Pierce LJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(3):713-21. PubMed ID: 11172953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic.
Jacobs JM; Salzberg CA
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 25853352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm®) dimensional changes and stretching in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
Wu C; Cipriano J; Osgood G; Tepper D; Siddiqui A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1376-81. PubMed ID: 23790562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional anatomical permanent expander implants: a prospective analysis of outcome and patient satisfaction.
Gui GP; Tan SM; Faliakou EC; Choy C; A'Hern R; Ward A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 111(1):125-38; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 12496573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLoop
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Ribuffo D; Calabrese C
Breast; 2018 Jun; 39():8-13. PubMed ID: 29455110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experiences with the use of ULTRAPRO
Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Gulyás G; Újhelyi M; Kovács E; Éles K; Mészáros N; Kenessey I; Pálházi P; Kovács T; Kásler M; Mátrai Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 28215734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review.
North WD; Kubajak CS; St Martin B; Rinker B
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6S Suppl 5):S282-S285. PubMed ID: 28296716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander after mastectomy in breast cancer patients.
Kim SW; Lee HK; Kang SM; Kang TH; Yoon CS; Ko SS; Hur MH; Kang SS; Seul CH; Gu JS
Breast Cancer; 2016 Mar; 23(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 25336184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
