These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3090570)

  • 1. Comparison of recent codes of practice for high-energy photon dosimetry.
    Mijnheer BJ; Wittkämper FW
    Phys Med Biol; 1986 Apr; 31(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 3090570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An experimental evaluation of recent electron dosimetry codes of practice.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):1999-2014. PubMed ID: 9725585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised code of practice for the dosimetry of 2 to 25 MV x-ray, and of caesium-137 and cobalt-60 gamma-ray beams.
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Oct; 28(10):1097-104. PubMed ID: 6417684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The photon calibration of a tissue-equivalent ionisation chamber for neutron dosimetry.
    Williams JR; Greening JR
    Phys Med Biol; 1980 Mar; 25(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 6770380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(6):741-71. PubMed ID: 6419029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AAPM Task Group 21 protocol: dosimetric evaluation.
    Paul JM; Koch RF; Philip PC
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 3929049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 2: The PTW/MARKUS chamber.
    Cross P; Freeman N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Jun; 20(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 9262032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between calculated and experimental kQ photon beam quality correction factors.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):L25-38. PubMed ID: 11008946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absorbed Dose to Water Determination Using IAEA, HPA, NACP, AAPM, NCRP and ICRU Protocols for 1.25 MeV Gamma Ray 6 MV and 10 MV X-Rays: An Intercomparison of Results when IAEA was taken as a Standard Protocol.
    Dolah MT; Samat SB; Kadni T
    Malays J Med Sci; 2000 Jan; 7(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 22844215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
    Cross P; Freeman N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.