These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3090595)

  • 21. Effects of chronically administered d-amphetamine on spaced responding maintained under multiple and single-component schedules.
    Smith JB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 88(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 3083449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of peripheral noradrenaline depletion on responding on a schedule of differential reinforcement of low rates of response (DRL).
    Salmon P; Stanford C; Gray JA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 87(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 3933040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate-schedule performance and nicotine administration: a systematic investigation of dose, dose-regimen, and schedule requirement.
    Kirshenbaum AP; Brown SJ; Hughes DM; Doughty AH
    Behav Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 19(7):683-97. PubMed ID: 18797245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acute effects of d-amphetamine on the differential reinforcement of low-rate (DRL) schedule behavior in the rat: comparison with selective dopamine receptor antagonists.
    Liao RM; Cheng RK
    Chin J Physiol; 2005 Mar; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15973966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of caffeine on timing behaviour in rodents: comparisons with chlordiazepoxide.
    Sanger DJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 68(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 6771817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Different effects of 5-HT receptor agonists on operant response in rats under DRL 10-s and DRL 30-s schedules.
    Liao RM; Chang YH
    Proc Natl Sci Counc Repub China B; 2001 Oct; 25(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 11699570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. d-amphetamine and fixed-interval performance: effects of operant history.
    Urbain C; Poling A; Millam J; Thompson T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 May; 29(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 670855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ethanol's effects on operant responding: differentiating reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
    Petry NM
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Apr; 64(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 9661991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Methylphenidate and d-amphetamine: effects and interactions with alphamethyltyrosine and tetrabenazine on DRL performance in rats.
    Seiden LS; Andresen J; MacPhail RC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Apr; 10(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 572553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can the DRL 72s schedule selectively reveal antidepressant drug activity?
    Jackson A; Koek W; Colpaert FC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1995 Jan; 117(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 7753961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differential effects of dopamine receptor subtype-specific agonists with respect to operant behavior maintained on a differential reinforcement of low-rate responding (DRL) schedule.
    Chiang FK; Cheng RK; Liao RM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2015 Mar; 130():67-76. PubMed ID: 25584855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine on schedule-controlled and schedule-induced responding.
    McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):445-56. PubMed ID: 512573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Greater task difficulty amplifies the facilitatory effect of des-glycinamide arginine vasopressin on appetitively motivated learning.
    Messing RB; Sparber SB
    Behav Neurosci; 1985 Dec; 99(6):1114-9. PubMed ID: 3843542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of signals in two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.
    Becraft JL; Borrero JC; Davis BJ; Mendres-Smith AE; Castillo MI
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 29313972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of combined or separate 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine lesions of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei on responding maintained by a DRL 20s schedule of food reinforcement.
    Fletcher PJ
    Brain Res; 1995 Mar; 675(1-2):45-54. PubMed ID: 7540930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Behavioral parameters of drug action: signaled and response-independent reinforcement.
    Thompson DM; Corr PB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Jan; 21(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 4810578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selective cytotoxic lesions of the hippocampal formation and DRL performance in rats.
    Sinden JD; Rawlins JN; Gray JA; Jarrard LE
    Behav Neurosci; 1986 Jun; 100(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 3755346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neurotensin, substance P, neurokinin-alpha, and enkephalin: injection into ventral tegmental area in the rat produces differential effects on operant responding.
    Kelley AE; Cador M; Stinus L; Le Moal M
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 97(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 2471221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Second-order stimuli do not always increase overall response rates in second-order schedules of reinforcement in the rat.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 15083254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.