These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30906095)

  • 1. Exact confidence limits for the probability of response in two-stage designs.
    Shan G
    Statistics (Ber); 2018; 52(5):1086-1095. PubMed ID: 30906095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact confidence limits for the response rate in two-stage designs with over- or under-enrollment in the second stage.
    Shan G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 27389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient confidence limits for adaptive one-arm two-stage clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Shan G; Zhang H; Jiang T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):22. PubMed ID: 28166741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exact p-values for Simon's two-stage designs in clinical trials.
    Shan G; Zhang H; Jiang T; Peterson H; Young D; Ma C
    Stat Biosci; 2016; 8(2):351-357. PubMed ID: 28003856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical inference for extended or shortened phase II studies based on Simon's two-stage designs.
    Zhao J; Yu M; Feng XP
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():48. PubMed ID: 26048655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact one-sided confidence limits for Cohen's kappa as a measurement of agreement.
    Shan G; Wang W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):615-632. PubMed ID: 25288510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified Simon's minimax and optimal two-stage designs for single-arm phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Kim J; Schell MJ
    Oncotarget; 2019 Jul; 10(42):4255-4261. PubMed ID: 31303960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidence intervals based on some weighting functions for the difference of two binomial proportions.
    Maruo K; Kawai N
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2288-96. PubMed ID: 24644149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-stage optimal designs with survival endpoint when the follow-up time is restricted.
    Shan G; Zhang H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):74. PubMed ID: 30943896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interval estimation of binomial proportion in clinical trials with a two-stage design.
    Tsai WY; Chi Y; Chen CM
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 17566141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-compatible confidence intervals for adaptive two-stage single-arm designs with binary endpoint.
    Kunzmann K; Kieser M
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):196-206. PubMed ID: 29076185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On construction of smallest one-sided confidence intervals for the response rate in adaptive two- or multi-stage designs.
    Wang W; Yin H; Zhang Z
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1682-1699. PubMed ID: 32491977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate confidence intervals for proportion in studies with clustered binary outcome.
    Shan G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):3006-3018. PubMed ID: 32242483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal adaptive two-stage designs for early phase II clinical trials.
    Shan G; Wilding GE; Hutson AD; Gerstenberger S
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1257-66. PubMed ID: 26526165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inclusion of non-inferiority analysis in superiority-based clinical trials with single-arm, two-stage Simon's design.
    Sampayo-Cordero M; Miguel-Huguet B; Pérez-García J; Páez D; Guerrero-Zotano ÁL; Garde-Noguera J; Aguirre E; Holgado E; López-Miranda E; Huang X; Malfettone A; Llombart-Cussac A; Cortés J
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2020 Dec; 20():100678. PubMed ID: 33336109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal inference for Simon's two-stage design with over or under enrollment at the second stage.
    Shan G; Chen JJ
    Commun Stat Simul Comput; 2018; 47(4):1157-1167. PubMed ID: 31097866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation and expected sample size in Simon's two-stage designs that stop as early as possible.
    Daletzakis A; van den Bor R; Jonker MA; Roes KCB; van Tinteren H
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Sep; 21(5):879-894. PubMed ID: 35191174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidence and coverage for Bland-Altman limits of agreement and their approximate confidence intervals.
    Carkeet A; Goh YT
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1559-1574. PubMed ID: 27587594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What inference for two-stage phase II trials?
    Porcher R; Desseaux K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():117. PubMed ID: 22867439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence intervals for the binomial parameter: some new considerations.
    Reiczigel J
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):611-21. PubMed ID: 12590417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.