202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30906273)
1. Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech.
Müller JA; Wendt D; Kollmeier B; Debener S; Brand T
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():449. PubMed ID: 30906273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.
Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Input-related demands: vocoded sentences evoke different pupillometrics and subjective listening effort than sentences in speech-shaped noise.
Giuliani NP; Venkitakrishnan S; Wu YH
Int J Audiol; 2024 Mar; 63(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 36519812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension.
Wendt D; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():345. PubMed ID: 27014152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Slower Speaking Rate Reduces Listening Effort Among Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Teece KH
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):584-595. PubMed ID: 33002968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of monetary reward on listening effort and sentence recognition.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108255. PubMed ID: 33964552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contributions of listening effort and intelligibility to cortical tracking of speech in adverse listening conditions.
Ershaid H; Lizarazu M; McLaughlin D; Cooke M; Simantiraki O; Koutsogiannaki M; Lallier M
Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():54-71. PubMed ID: 38215511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study.
Borghini G; Hazan V
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():152. PubMed ID: 29593489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The costs (and benefits) of effortful listening on context processing: A simultaneous electrophysiology, pupillometry, and behavioral study.
Silcox JW; Payne BR
Cortex; 2021 Sep; 142():296-316. PubMed ID: 34332197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
