These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30907859)

  • 21. A clinical evaluation of two multifocal soft contact lenses.
    Gussler CH; Solomon KD; Gussler JR; Litteral G; Van Meter WS
    CLAO J; 1992 Oct; 18(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 1424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The association of comfort and vision in soft toric contact lens wear.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Navascues Cornago M; Read ML; Plowright AJ; Vega J; Orsborn GN; Morgan PB
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2021 Aug; 44(4):101387. PubMed ID: 33308907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Task and visual performance with concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jul; 68(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 1923325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual performance of four simultaneous-image multifocal contact lenses under dim and glare conditions.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Jan; 41(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes.
    Fedtke C; Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Chung J; Thomas V; Holden BA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Feb; 39(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26228543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vision Performance and Accommodative/Binocular Function in Children Wearing Prototype Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.
    Tilia D; Sha J; Thomas V; Bakaraju RC
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Jul; 45(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 30601291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Myopic astigmatism and presbyopia trial.
    Savage H; Rothstein M; Davuluri G; El Ghormli L; Zaetta DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 135(5):628-32. PubMed ID: 12719069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optical and visual performance of aspheric soft contact lenses.
    Efron S; Efron N; Morgan PB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 18317336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing children's, teenagers' and young adults' subjective responses to myopia control contact lenses.
    Tahhan N; Naduvilath T; Tilia D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 May; 43(3):418-425. PubMed ID: 36722376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, subjective quality of vision, and quality of life with 4 different multifocal IOLs.
    Gil MA; Varon C; Rosello N; Cardona G; Buil JA
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 21623590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors That Influence the Success of Contact Lens Fitting in Presbyopes: A Multicentric Survey.
    Zeri F; Di Censi M; Livi S; Ercoli A; Naroo SA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Nov; 45(6):382-389. PubMed ID: 31008825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual function through 4 contact lens-based pinhole systems for presbyopia.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Cerviño A; Charman WN; Montés-Micó R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 22424803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical performance of an innovative back surface multifocal contact lens in correcting presbyopia.
    Woods C; Ruston D; Hough T; Efron N
    CLAO J; 1999 Jul; 25(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10444055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical Efficacy of Pinhole Soft Contact Lenses for the Correction of Presbyopia.
    Park SY; Choi YJ; Jung JW; Choi M; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2019; 34(2):106-114. PubMed ID: 30865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.