234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30908363)
1. Effect of Postoperative Telephone Calls on Patient Satisfaction and Scar Satisfaction After Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Vance S; Fontecilla N; Samie FH; Patel V; Lewin JM
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1459-1464. PubMed ID: 30908363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient satisfaction with post-operative telephone calls after Mohs micrographic surgery: a New Zealand and U.K. experience.
Hafiji J; Salmon P; Hussain W
Br J Dermatol; 2012 Sep; 167(3):570-4. PubMed ID: 22524509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early postoperative single treatment ablative fractional lasing of Mohs micrographic surgery facial scars: a split-scar, evaluator-blinded study.
Sobanko JF; Vachiramon V; Rattanaumpawan P; Miller CJ
Lasers Surg Med; 2015 Jan; 47(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25559589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient Scar Assessment Correlates With Quality of Life After Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Fix WC; Etzkorn JR; Zhang J; Sobanko JF
Dermatol Surg; 2020 Dec; 46(12):1745-1747. PubMed ID: 31592916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative telephone consultation does not decrease patient anxiety before Mohs micrographic surgery.
Sobanko JF; Da Silva D; Chiesa Fuxench ZC; Modi B; Shin TM; Etzkorn JR; Samimi SS; Wanat KA; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2017 Mar; 76(3):519-526. PubMed ID: 27923500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary on The Effect of Postoperative Telephone Calls on Patient Satisfaction and Scar Satisfaction Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Golda N
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1465-1466. PubMed ID: 31188148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To see or not to see: Impact of viewing facial skin cancer defects prior to reconstruction.
Veldhuizen IJ; Lee EH; Kurtansky NR; van Hensbergen LJ; Dusza SW; Hölscher MC; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ottenhof MJ; Pusic AL; Hoogbergen MM
Arch Dermatol Res; 2021 Dec; 313(10):847-853. PubMed ID: 33515277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors impacting patient ratings of Mohs micrographic surgeons: Lessons gleaned from analysis of 17,527 online reviews.
Trager MH; Ensslin CE; Fan W; Samie FH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Dec; 83(6):1825-1827. PubMed ID: 32450101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient Education on Scarring Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Patient Preference for Information Delivery.
Aleisa A; Veldhuizen IJ; Rossi AM; Nehal KS; Lee EH
Dermatol Surg; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1155-1158. PubMed ID: 36342247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparison of Preoperative Telephone Call Versus Mailed Educational Materials on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Taylor SL; Quan EY; Lockhart ERS; Prickett KA; Phillips MA
Dermatol Surg; 2024 Apr; 50(4):337-340. PubMed ID: 38232345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient Concerns in the Immediate Postoperative Period After Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Giordano CN; Mori S; Navarrete-Dechent C; Dusza SW; Rossi AM; Nehal KS; Lee EH
Dermatol Surg; 2020 Apr; 46(4):514-518. PubMed ID: 31592922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Extranasal Bilobed Transposition Flaps in Cutaneous Reconstructive Surgery at 2 Institutions.
Steele RB; Jellinek NJ; Foy A; Lee K; Vij A; Knackstedt TJ
Dermatol Surg; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1279-1285. PubMed ID: 31929338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the Appearance of Surgical Facial Scars With IncobotulinumtoxinA and Microneedling.
Casabona GR; Giacomo TB
J Drugs Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 19(6):611-615. PubMed ID: 32574010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal timing of postoperative patient telephone calls after Mohs micrographic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
Bednarek R; Jonak C; Golda N
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Jul; 85(1):220-221. PubMed ID: 32745493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors Associated with Patient-Initiated Telephone Calls After Spine Surgery.
Reid R; Puvanesarajah V; Kandil A; Yildirim B; Shimer AL; Singla A; Shen FH; Hassanzadeh H
World Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 98():625-631. PubMed ID: 27838431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining patient preferences and willingness to pay related to scar length and appearance after skin cancer treatment on the face and trunk: A multicenter discrete choice experiment.
Golda N; Black W; Patel V; Neal D; Etzkorn J
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Oct; 81(4):1011-1013. PubMed ID: 30731171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A Split-Scar Study Investigating the Effectiveness of Early Intervention With Electroabrasion on Improving the Cosmetic Appearance of Postsurgical Scars.
Kannan S; de Golian E; Lee N; Smith J; Brian Jiang SI
Dermatol Surg; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1300-1305. PubMed ID: 32028480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut versus 6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut during cutaneous wound closure on the head and neck: A randomized evaluator-blinded split-wound comparative effectiveness trial.
Pourang A; Crispin MK; Clark AK; Armstrong AW; Sivamani RK; Eisen DB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Jul; 81(1):213-218. PubMed ID: 30797848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes of Second Intention Healing for Mohs Defects of the Lips.
Donigan JM; Millican EA
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Jan; 45(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 29994950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
