195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30909661)
1. Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Grading from Gleason to the New Grade-Group System: A Historical and Critical Review.
Barakzai MA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):661-666. PubMed ID: 30909661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer: from Gleason scoring to prognostic grade grouping.
Montironi R; Santoni M; Mazzucchelli R; Burattini L; Berardi R; Galosi AB; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Scarpelli M
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2016; 16(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 27008205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.
Gordetsky J; Epstein J
Diagn Pathol; 2016 Mar; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26956509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in prostate cancer grading: Including a new patient-centric grading system.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2016 Apr; 76(5):427-33. PubMed ID: 26709152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Egevad L; Mazzucchelli R; Montironi R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 22458905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B
Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.
Dong F; Wang C; Farris AB; Wu S; Lee H; Olumi AF; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 22592143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping and Histopathological Parameters: Can the "New System" Reflect the Pathological Perspective for Prognosis?
Dere Y; Altınboğa AA; Yaldır E; Bal K; Tosun K; Sarı A
Arch Iran Med; 2018 Nov; 21(11):518-523. PubMed ID: 30551692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic influence of the third Gleason grade in prostatectomy specimens.
Cedeño Díaz OM; Fernández Aceñero MJ; Alvarez Fernández E
Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 21292510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care.
Brimo F; Montironi R; Egevad L; Erbersdobler A; Lin DW; Nelson JB; Rubin MA; van der Kwast T; Amin M; Epstein JI
Eur Urol; 2013 May; 63(5):892-901. PubMed ID: 23092544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of limited (tertiary) Gleason pattern 5 on the new prostate cancer grade groups.
Baras AS; Nelson JB; Han M; Parwani AV; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2017 May; 63():27-32. PubMed ID: 27993581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
