195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30909661)
21. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The prognostic importance of Gleason grade in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a long-term follow-up study of 648 patients treated with radiation therapy.
Zagars GK; Ayala AG; von Eschenbach AC; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 7836075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic importance of Gleason 7 disease among patients treated with external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: results of a detailed biopsy core analysis.
Spratt DE; Zumsteg Z; Ghadjar P; Pangasa M; Pei X; Fine SW; Yamada Y; Kollmeier M; Zelefsky MJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Apr; 85(5):1254-61. PubMed ID: 23182392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Faraj SF; Bezerra SM; Yousefi K; Fedor H; Glavaris S; Han M; Partin AW; Humphreys E; Tosoian J; Johnson MH; Davicioni E; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE; Netto GJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146189. PubMed ID: 26731672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.
Diolombi ML; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2017 Jun; 119(6):872-878. PubMed ID: 27496532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Djavan B; Kadesky K; Klopukh B; Marberger M; Roehrborn CG
Eur Urol; 1998; 33(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 9555550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Robinson D; Lissbrant IF; Egevad L; Stattin P
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1135-41. PubMed ID: 26707871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence.
Cole AI; Morgan TM; Spratt DE; Palapattu GS; He C; Tomlins SA; Weizer AZ; Feng FY; Wu A; Siddiqui J; Chinnaiyan AM; Montgomery JS; Kunju LP; Miller DC; Hollenbeck BK; Wei JT; Mehra R
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):405-11. PubMed ID: 26920466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clinical practice.
Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Epstein JI
Curr Opin Urol; 2016 Sep; 26(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 27308734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic significance of paneth cell-like neuroendocrine differentiation in adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Tamas EF; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Aug; 30(8):980-5. PubMed ID: 16861969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The new ISUP 2014/WHO 2016 prostate cancer grade group system: first résumé 5 years after introduction and systemic review of the literature.
Offermann A; Hupe MC; Sailer V; Merseburger AS; Perner S
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):657-662. PubMed ID: 30941561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Integrating Tertiary Gleason 5 Patterns into Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
Sauter G; Clauditz T; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Büscheck F; Krech T; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Harms L; Lawrenz L; Möller-Koop C; Simon R; Jacobsen F; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Weidemann S; Haese A; Steuber T; Salomon G; Matiu M; Vettorazzi E; Michl U; Budäus L; Tilki D; Thederan I; Pehrke D; Beyer B; Fraune C; Göbel C; Heinrich M; Juhnke M; Möller K; Bawahab AAA; Uhlig R; Huland H; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Schlomm T
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):674-683. PubMed ID: 28117112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Collagenous micronodules in prostate cancer revisited: are they solely associated with Gleason pattern 3 adenocarcinomas?
Kim MJ; Divatia MK; Lee JH; Shen S; Miles BJ; Hwang JH; Ayala AG; Ro JY
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(4):3469-76. PubMed ID: 26097531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gleason and Fuhrman no longer make the grade.
Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Martignoni G; Nacey JN; Srigley JR
Histopathology; 2016 Mar; 68(4):475-81. PubMed ID: 26266664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Grading of prostate cancer].
Kristiansen G; Roth W; Helpap B
Pathologe; 2016 Jul; 37(4):352-4. PubMed ID: 27393141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
