191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30910446)
1. Surgical management of congenital uterine anomalies (including indications and surgical techniques).
Theodoridis TD; Pappas PD; Grimbizis GF
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59():66-76. PubMed ID: 30910446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Campo R; Gordts S; Spinelli M; Cosimato C; Tanos V; Brucker S; Li TC; Gergolet M; De Angelis C; Gianaroli L; Grimbizis G
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1046-58. PubMed ID: 25788565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive Implications and Management of Congenital Uterine Anomalies: Scientific Impact Paper No. 62 November 2019.
Akhtar MA; Saravelos SH; Li TC; Jayaprakasan K;
BJOG; 2020 Apr; 127(5):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 31749334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ESHRE/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice.
Knez J; Saridogan E; Van Den Bosch T; Mavrelos D; Ambler G; Jurkovic D
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 29514262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):569-80. PubMed ID: 25534461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine anomalies and endometriosis.
Freytag D; Mettler L; Maass N; Günther V; Alkatout I
Minerva Med; 2020 Feb; 111(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 31755672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility and miscarriage, cost and warnings for women and healthcare systems.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Coelho Neto MA; Nastri CO; Bhagavath B; Lindheim SR; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):800-814. PubMed ID: 30977223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Exceptional Case of Complete Septate Uterus With Unilateral Cervical Aplasia (Class U2bC3V0/ESHRE/ESGE Classification) and Isolated Mullerian Remnants: Combined Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Treatment.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Giampaolino P; Scognamiglio M; Varelli C; Nazzaro G; Mansueto G; Nappi C; Grimbizis GF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 26391060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Congenital uterine anomalies and their association with fertility and pregnancy outcomes].
Mørk N; Lauszus FF; Agha Krogh RH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2018 Oct; 180(40):. PubMed ID: 30274578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Müllerian anomalies and recurrent miscarriage.
Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozaki Y; Suzumori N
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 25(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23812381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Female genital tract congenital malformations and the applicability of the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a systematic retrospective analysis of 920 patients.
Schöller D; Hölting M; Stefanescu D; Burow H; Schönfisch B; Rall K; Taran FA; Grimbizis GF; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Brucker SY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 29549434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quadro-Cornuate Uterus.
Nauman Y; Husain S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Nov; 26(11):S97-S99. PubMed ID: 28666494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract.
Graupera B; Pascual MA; Hereter L; Browne JL; Úbeda B; Rodríguez I; Pedrero C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 25690307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Müllerian duct anomalies diagnosed by saline contrast sonohysterography: prevalence in a general population.
Dreisler E; Stampe Sørensen S
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):525-9. PubMed ID: 24875399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive performance of women with müllerian anomalies.
Rackow BW; Arici A
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 19(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 17495638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysteroscopic Corrections for Complete Septate and T-Shaped Uteri Have Similar Surgical and Reproductive Outcome.
Şükür YE; Yakıştıran B; Özmen B; Sönmezer M; Berker B; Atabekoğlu C
Reprod Sci; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1649-1654. PubMed ID: 29402197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Venetis CA; Papadopoulos SP; Campo R; Gordts S; Tarlatzis BC; Grimbizis GF
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Dec; 29(6):665-83. PubMed ID: 25444500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Kougioumtsidou A; Mikos T; Grimbizis GF; Karavida A; Theodoridis TD; Sotiriadis A; Tarlatzis BC; Athanasiadis AP
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 299(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 30661094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Congenital malformations of the uterus: the role of ultrasound.
Puscheck EE; Cohen L
Semin Reprod Med; 2008 May; 26(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 18504697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Gordts S; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Brölmann H; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2032-44. PubMed ID: 23771171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
