These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30911825)

  • 1. Test of a dynamic neural field model: spatial working memory is biased away from distractors.
    Schutte AR; DeGirolamo GJ
    Psychol Res; 2020 Sep; 84(6):1528-1544. PubMed ID: 30911825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developmental Differences in the Influence of Distractors on Maintenance in Spatial Working Memory.
    Schutte AR; Keiser BA; Beattie HL
    J Cogn Dev; 2017; 18(3):338-357. PubMed ID: 30906231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing a dynamic-field account of interactions between spatial attention and spatial working memory.
    Johnson JS; Spencer JP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1043-63. PubMed ID: 26810574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in executive attention and inhibitory control are related to spatial memory biases in adults.
    Schutte AR; Wu Y; Jacoby MN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):391-403. PubMed ID: 35331058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is attention really biased toward the last target location in visual search? Attention, response rules, distractors, and eye movements.
    Hilchey MD; Antinucci V; Lamy D; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):506-514. PubMed ID: 30796630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space.
    Sahan MI; Verguts T; Boehler CN; Pourtois G; Fias W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26704925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory-driven attention improves spatial resolution: Support for perceptual enhancement.
    Pan Y; Luo Q; Cheng M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1625-32. PubMed ID: 27192995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repulsion bias is insensitive to spatial attention, yet expands during active working memory maintenance.
    Sun M; Huang Y; Ying H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38862765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The control of saccade trajectories: direction of curvature depends on prior knowledge of target location and saccade latency.
    Walker R; McSorley E; Haggard P
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Jan; 68(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 16617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial working memory maintenance: does attention play a role? A visual search study.
    Chan LK; Hayward WG; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Oct; 132(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 19362280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test of a Relationship between Spatial Working Memory and Perception of Symmetry Axes in Children 3 to 6 Years of Age.
    Wu Y; Schutte AR
    Spat Cogn Comput; 2020; 20(2):104-133. PubMed ID: 33013190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations.
    Marini F; Scott J; Aron AR; Ester EF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28439791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing the dynamic field theory: working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development.
    Schutte AR; Spencer JP; Schöner G
    Child Dev; 2003; 74(5):1393-417. PubMed ID: 14552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracking the time-course of attentional involvement in spatial working memory: an event-related potential investigation.
    Jha AP
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 15(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 12506934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: three-year-olds' delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases.
    Schutte AR; Spencer JP
    Child Dev; 2002; 73(2):377-404. PubMed ID: 11949898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymmetric learning of dynamic spatial regularities in visual search: Robust facilitation of predictable target locations, fragile suppression of distractor locations.
    Yu H; Allenmark F; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 May; 49(5):709-724. PubMed ID: 37261775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.