These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30912035)

  • 21. Theory protection in associative learning: Humans maintain certain beliefs in a manner that violates prediction error.
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 31556642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of outcome and trial frequency on the inverse base-rate effect.
    Don HJ; Livesey EJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):493-507. PubMed ID: 27815818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Failures of explaining away and screening off in described versus experienced causal learning scenarios.
    Rehder B; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):245-260. PubMed ID: 27826953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.
    Mitchell CJ; Killedar A; Lovibond PF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 16248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can We Set Aside Previous Experience in a Familiar Causal Scenario?
    Greenaway JK; Livesey EJ
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():578775. PubMed ID: 33329230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect.
    Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Deductive updating is not Bayesian.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):949-56. PubMed ID: 25603167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A dissociation between causal judgment and outcome recall.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Gan CY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):950-4. PubMed ID: 16524016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relative salience versus relative validity: cue salience influences blocking in human associative learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):116-32. PubMed ID: 24099508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning.
    Boddez Y; Baeyens F; Hermans D; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21319914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Toddlers infer higher-order relational principles in causal learning.
    Walker CM; Gopnik A
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):161-9. PubMed ID: 24270464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Naive theories and causal deduction.
    Cummins DD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):646-58. PubMed ID: 7476249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Blocking a redundant cue: what does it say about preschoolers' causal competence?
    Kloos H; Sloutsky VM
    Dev Sci; 2013 Sep; 16(5):713-27. PubMed ID: 24033577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cue competition effects and young children's causal and counterfactual inferences.
    McCormack T; Butterfill S; Hoerl C; Burns P
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Nov; 45(6):1563-75. PubMed ID: 19899914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Independence and dependence in human causal reasoning.
    Rehder B
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jul; 72():54-107. PubMed ID: 24681802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: evidence from an overshadowing paradigm.
    Waldmann MR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):600-8. PubMed ID: 11700912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Neilens H; Over D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):892-909. PubMed ID: 19728225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Causing time: Evaluating causal changes to the when rather than the whether of an outcome.
    Greville WJ; Buehner MJ; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):200-211. PubMed ID: 32034691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. People want to see information that will help them make valid inferences in human causal learning.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1133-9. PubMed ID: 17128611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.
    De Houwer J; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Nov; 56(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 14578079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.