175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30912178)
1. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard.
Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U
Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole-Breast Ultrasound for Breast Screening and Archiving.
Huang CS; Yang YW; Chen RT; Lo CM; Lo C; Cheng CF; Lee CS; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):926-933. PubMed ID: 28283326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
Barr RG; DeVita R; Destounis S; Manzoni F; De Silvestri A; Tinelli C
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 28569407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The image quality and lesion characterization of breast using automated whole-breast ultrasound: A comparison with handheld ultrasound.
An YY; Kim SH; Kang BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1232-5. PubMed ID: 25975896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner.
Zheng FY; Yan LX; Huang BJ; Xia HS; Wang X; Lu Q; Li CX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2123-9. PubMed ID: 26272029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
