These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30913055)

  • 1. Agreement and Reproducibility of Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements Using Commercial MR Sequences Across Different Platforms: A Multivendor, Multi-Institutional Phantom Experiment.
    Jang JK; Lee SS; Kim B; Cho ES; Kim YJ; Byun JH; Park BJ; Kim SY; Kim JH
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Aug; 54(8):517-523. PubMed ID: 30913055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of proton density fat fraction measurement across field strengths and scan intervals: A phantom and human study.
    Kim HJ; Cho HJ; Kim B; You MW; Lee JH; Huh J; Kim JK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 50(1):305-314. PubMed ID: 30430684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisite, multivendor validation of the accuracy and reproducibility of proton-density fat-fraction quantification at 1.5T and 3T using a fat-water phantom.
    Hernando D; Sharma SD; Aliyari Ghasabeh M; Alvis BD; Arora SS; Hamilton G; Pan L; Shaffer JM; Sofue K; Szeverenyi NM; Welch EB; Yuan Q; Bashir MR; Kamel IR; Rice MJ; Sirlin CB; Yokoo T; Reeder SB
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Apr; 77(4):1516-1524. PubMed ID: 27080068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term inter-platform reproducibility, bias, and linearity of commercial PDFF MRI methods for fat quantification: a multi-center, multi-vendor phantom study.
    Schneider E; Remer EM; Obuchowski NA; McKenzie CA; Ding X; Navaneethan SD
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7566-7574. PubMed ID: 33768291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linearity, Bias, and Precision of Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements by Using MR Imaging: A Meta-Analysis.
    Yokoo T; Serai SD; Pirasteh A; Bashir MR; Hamilton G; Hernando D; Hu HH; Hetterich H; Kühn JP; Kukuk GM; Loomba R; Middleton MS; Obuchowski NA; Song JS; Tang A; Wu X; Reeder SB; Sirlin CB;
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):486-498. PubMed ID: 28892458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proton density fat fraction MRI of vertebral bone marrow: Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility among readers, field strengths, and imaging platforms.
    Schmeel FC; Vomweg T; Träber F; Gerhards A; Enkirch SJ; Faron A; Sprinkart AM; Schmeel LC; Luetkens JA; Thomas D; Kukuk GM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Dec; 50(6):1762-1772. PubMed ID: 30980694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements at 1.5- and 3-T Hepatic MR Imaging: Same-Day Agreement among Readers and across Two Imager Manufacturers.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):244-254. PubMed ID: 28212052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linearity and Bias of Proton Density Fat Fraction as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker: A Multicenter, Multiplatform, Multivendor Phantom Study.
    Hu HH; Yokoo T; Bashir MR; Sirlin CB; Hernando D; Malyarenko D; Chenevert TL; Smith MA; Serai SD; Middleton MS; Henderson WC; Hamilton G; Shaffer J; Shu Y; Tkach JA; Trout AT; Obuchowski N; Brittain JH; Jackson EF; Reeder SB;
    Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):640-651. PubMed ID: 33464181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisite multivendor validation of a quantitative MRI and CT compatible fat phantom.
    Zhao R; Hernando D; Harris DT; Hinshaw LA; Li K; Ananthakrishnan L; Bashir MR; Duan X; Ghasabeh MA; Kamel IR; Lowry C; Mahesh M; Marin D; Miller J; Pickhardt PJ; Shaffer J; Yokoo T; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
    Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4375-4386. PubMed ID: 34105167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proton density fat fraction measurements of rotator cuff muscles: Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility across readers and scanners.
    Wang TY; Nie P; Zhao X; Wang HX; Wan GY; Zhou RZ; Zhong X; Zhang Y; Yu TB; Hao DP
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Oct; 92():260-267. PubMed ID: 35623416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linearity and bias of proton density fat fraction across the full dynamic range of 0-100%: a multiplatform, multivendor phantom study using 1.5T and 3T MRI at two sites.
    Hu HH; Chen HS; Hernando D
    MAGMA; 2024 Aug; 37(4):551-563. PubMed ID: 38349454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of hepatic fat quantification across 5 T, 3 T and 1.5 T: A study on consistency and feasibility.
    Liu J; Wang Z; Yu D; Yang Y; Li Z; Wang X; Yang Y; Cheng C; Zou C; Gan J
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Nov; 180():111709. PubMed ID: 39222564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High SNR Acquisitions Improve the Repeatability of Liver Fat Quantification Using Confounder-corrected Chemical Shift-encoded MR Imaging.
    Motosugi U; Hernando D; Wiens C; Bannas P; Reeder SB
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):332-339. PubMed ID: 28190853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a motion-robust 2D sequential technique for quantification of hepatic proton density fat fraction during free breathing.
    Pooler BD; Hernando D; Ruby JA; Ishii H; Shimakawa A; Reeder SB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1578-1585. PubMed ID: 29665193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-level fat fraction quantification at 3 T: comparative study of different tools for water-fat reconstruction and MR spectroscopy.
    Kořínek R; Gajdošík M; Trattnig S; Starčuk Z; Krššák M
    MAGMA; 2020 Aug; 33(4):455-468. PubMed ID: 31980962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRI proton density fat fraction is robust across the biologically plausible range of triglyceride spectra in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
    Hong CW; Mamidipalli A; Hooker JC; Hamilton G; Wolfson T; Chen DH; Fazeli Dehkordy S; Middleton MS; Reeder SB; Loomba R; Sirlin CB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):995-1002. PubMed ID: 28851124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diurnal Variation of Proton Density Fat Fraction in the Liver Using Quantitative Chemical Shift Encoded MRI.
    Colgan TJ; Van Pay AJ; Sharma SD; Mao L; Reeder SB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Feb; 51(2):407-414. PubMed ID: 31168893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of MR-based liver fat quantification across field strength: Same-day comparison between 1.5T and 3T in obese subjects.
    Artz NS; Haufe WM; Hooker CA; Hamilton G; Wolfson T; Campos GM; Gamst AC; Schwimmer JB; Sirlin CB; Reeder SB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(3):811-7. PubMed ID: 25620624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter, multivendor phantom study to validate proton density fat fraction and T2* values calculated using vendor-provided 6-point DIXON methods.
    Hayashi T; Fukuzawa K; Yamazaki H; Konno T; Miyati T; Kotoku J; Oba H; Kondo H; Toyoda K; Saitoh S
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():38-42. PubMed ID: 29425901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra- and inter-examination repeatability of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, magnitude-based MRI, and complex-based MRI for estimation of hepatic proton density fat fraction in overweight and obese children and adults.
    Tyagi A; Yeganeh O; Levin Y; Hooker JC; Hamilton GC; Wolfson T; Gamst A; Zand AK; Heba E; Loomba R; Schwimmer J; Middleton MS; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3070-7. PubMed ID: 26350282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.