These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30913244)

  • 21. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The power of approximate degrees of freedom tests in heteroscedastic factorial designs.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):871-83. PubMed ID: 25123908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects.
    Shieh G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():110-7. PubMed ID: 26777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal sample sizes for precise interval estimation of Welch's procedure under various allocation and cost considerations.
    Shieh G; Jan SL
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 21805061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A note on preliminary tests of equality of variances.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):173-81. PubMed ID: 15171807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of heterogeneous variance on efficiency and power of cluster randomized trials with a balanced 2 × 2 factorial design.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):574-93. PubMed ID: 25911332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sample size estimation for heterogeneous growth curve models with attrition.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP; Livacic-Rojas PE
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1216-1243. PubMed ID: 29934696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating Standardized Effect Sizes for Two- and Three-Level Partially Nested Data.
    Lai MH; Kwok OM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):740-756. PubMed ID: 27802077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
    Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for the standardized mean difference effect size between two normal populations under heteroscedasticity.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):955-67. PubMed ID: 23468180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size calculations for model validation in linear regression analysis.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 30866825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficient treatment allocation in 2 × 2 cluster randomized trials, when costs and variances are heterogeneous.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJ; Berger MP
    Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(24):4320-4334. PubMed ID: 27271007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficient treatment allocation in 2 × 2 multicenter trials when costs and variances are heterogeneous.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJP; Candel MJJM
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 28948651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. PopED: an extended, parallelized, nonlinear mixed effects models optimal design tool.
    Nyberg J; Ueckert S; Strömberg EA; Hennig S; Karlsson MO; Hooker AC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Nov; 108(2):789-805. PubMed ID: 22640817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy in parameter estimation for ANCOVA and ANOVA contrasts: sample size planning via narrow confidence intervals.
    Lai K; Kelley K
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 May; 65(2):350-70. PubMed ID: 22004142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Meta-analysis of ratios of sample variances.
    Prendergast LA; Staudte RG
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1780-99. PubMed ID: 27062644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 27878852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.