These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30913444)

  • 41. Inter-sample contamination detection using mixture deconvolution comparison.
    Taylor D; Rowe E; Kruijver M; Abarno D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():160-167. PubMed ID: 30851600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. STRmix
    Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Exploring how the LR of a POI in a target sample is impacted by awareness of the profile of the background derived from an area adjacent to the target sample.
    Reither JB; Taylor D; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102868. PubMed ID: 37001465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haned H; Snipen L; Sæbø S; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():93-101. PubMed ID: 24528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Application of random match probability calculations to mixed STR profiles.
    Bille T; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):474-85. PubMed ID: 23425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The comparison of DNA mixture profiles with multiple persons of interest.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102592. PubMed ID: 34739935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
    Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures.
    Wolf A; Caliebe A; Junge O; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15978347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Probabilistic Genotyping of Single Cell Replicates from Mixtures Involving First-Degree Relatives Prevents the False Inclusions of Non-Donor Relatives.
    Huffman K; Ballantyne J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36140825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
    Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Testing likelihood ratios produced from complex DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Buckleton J; Evett I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():165-171. PubMed ID: 25621923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Determining the number and size of background samples derived from an area adjacent to the target sample that provide the greatest support for a POI in a target sample.
    Reither JB; Taylor D; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jan; 68():102977. PubMed ID: 38000160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study.
    Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1263-76. PubMed ID: 26258391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures.
    Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Yara Gambirasio case: Combining evidence in a complex DNA mixture case.
    Graversen T; Mortera J; Lago G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():52-63. PubMed ID: 30776772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.