222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30914155)
1. Factors affecting the negative predictive value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients.
Kim J; Cho H; Gwak G; Yang K; Kim JY; Shin YJ; Seo YY; Park I
Asian J Surg; 2020 Jan; 43(1):193-200. PubMed ID: 30914155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective comparative study of ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients.
Guney IB; Dalci K; Teke ZT; Kucuker KA
Ann Ital Chir; 2020; 91():458-464. PubMed ID: 32213685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting the accuracy of
Kutluturk K; Simsek A; Comak A; Gonultas F; Unal B; Kekilli E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 30666022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of predicting low-burden (≤ 2) positive axillary lymph nodes indicating sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary operable breast cancer - a retrospective comparative study with PET/CT and breast MRI.
Sae-Lim C; Wu WP; Chang MC; Lai HW; Chen ST; Chou CT; Liao CY; Huang HI; Chen ST; Chen DR; Hung CL
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 38183069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Major Reduction in Axillary Lymph Node Dissections After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer by combining PET/CT and the MARI Procedure.
van der Noordaa MEM; van Duijnhoven FH; Straver ME; Groen EJ; Stokkel M; Loo CE; Elkhuizen PHM; Russell NS; Vrancken Peeters MTFD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1512-1520. PubMed ID: 29511992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.
Riegger C; Koeninger A; Hartung V; Otterbach F; Kimmig R; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 23002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Axillary staging using positron emission tomography in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Fehr MK; Hornung R; Varga Z; Burger D; Hess T; Haller U; Fink D; von Schulthess GK; Steinert HC
Breast J; 2004; 10(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 15009033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidetector-row computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of axillary nodal status in patients with breast cancer.
Ogasawara Y; Doihara H; Shiraiwa M; Ishihara S
Surg Today; 2008; 38(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 18239865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography versus conventional imaging for the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph node metastases.
Shao M; Zi J; Wen G
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018 Sep; 14(Supplement):S661-S666. PubMed ID: 30249884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FDG PET positive lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastasis in breast cancer.
Kumar R; Zhuang H; Schnall M; Conant E; Damia S; Weinstein S; Chandra P; Czerniecki B; Alavi A
Nucl Med Commun; 2006 Mar; 27(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 16479242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Comparison between Staging
Gupta R; Das J; Sinha S; Agarwal S; Sharma A; Ahmed R; Chanda A; Arun I; Ray S
Indian J Nucl Med; 2023; 38(3):249-254. PubMed ID: 38046972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.
Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Role of Axillary SUV
Karabacak U; Turkan H; Coskun G; Mollaoglu MC; Hasbek Z; Karadayi K
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Apr; 33(4):374-379. PubMed ID: 37190706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of PET-CT and MRI for evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in early breast cancer patients.
Dulgeroglu O; Arikan AE; Capkinoglu E; Kara H; Uras C
Ann Ital Chir; 2022; 93():648-655. PubMed ID: 36617275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of ultrasonography and FDG-PET in axillary lymph node staging of breast cancer.
Ahn JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Youk JH; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Ryu YH; Jeong J
Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):859-65. PubMed ID: 20670083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients.
Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Hahn S; Koeninger A; Otterbach F; Hamami ME; Kimmig KR; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2009 Oct; 36(10):1543-50. PubMed ID: 19415270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Added value of dedicated axillary hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI for improved axillary nodal staging in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients: a feasibility study.
van Nijnatten TJA; Goorts B; Vöö S; de Boer M; Kooreman LFS; Heuts EM; Wildberger JE; Mottaghy FM; Lobbes MBI; Smidt ML
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Feb; 45(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 28905091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer by 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography: clinical evaluation and alternative management.
Greco M; Crippa F; Agresti R; Seregni E; Gerali A; Giovanazzi R; Micheli A; Asero S; Ferraris C; Gennaro M; Bombardieri E; Cascinelli N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Apr; 93(8):630-5. PubMed ID: 11309439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, sonography, and sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: comparison of diagnostic performance.
Sohn YM; Hong IK; Han K
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jun; 33(6):1013-21. PubMed ID: 24866608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG-PET for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer.
Crippa F; Gerali A; Alessi A; Agresti R; Bombardieri E
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():S97-102. PubMed ID: 15133635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
