216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30915565)
1. Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.
Kirss J; Huhtinen H; Niskanen E; Ruohonen J; Kallio-Packalen M; Victorzon S; Victorzon M; Pinta T
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5717-5722. PubMed ID: 30915565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3T external phased-array magnetic resonance imaging in detection of obstetric anal sphincter lesions: a pilot study.
Pinta T; Ruohonen J; Kallio-Packalen M; Zhabin I; Kirss J
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 35787708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postpartum two- and three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of anal sphincter complex in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury.
Ros C; Martínez-Franco E; Wozniak MM; Cassado J; Santoro GA; Elías N; López M; Palacio M; Wieczorek AP; Espuña-Pons M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):508-514. PubMed ID: 27087312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of 3 ultrasound modalities for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries.
Taithongchai A; van Gruting IMA; Volløyhaug I; Arendsen LP; Sultan AH; Thakar R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 221(2):134.e1-134.e9. PubMed ID: 30981717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of transperineal and endoanal ultrasound in detecting residual obstetric anal sphincter injury.
Stuart A; Ignell C; Örnö AK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Dec; 98(12):1624-1631. PubMed ID: 31378920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.
Walsh KA; Grivell RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Oct; 2015(10):CD010826. PubMed ID: 26513224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of endoanal ultrasound in detecting obstetric anal sphincter injury immediately after birth.
Huber M; Larsson C; Harrysson M; Strigård K; Lehmann JP; Nordin P; Tunón K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Mar; 102(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 36683208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal.
Sioutis D; Thakar R; Sultan AH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):642-647. PubMed ID: 27643513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pilot study comparing tolerance of transperineal and endoanal ultrasound examination of anal sphincter.
Hubka P; Švabík K; Mašata J; Martan A
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(2):111-114. PubMed ID: 31238680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How comparable is clinical grading of obstetric anal sphincter injury with that determined by four-dimensional translabial ultrasound?
Gillor M; Shek KL; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 56(4):618-623. PubMed ID: 32149422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of anal sphincter defects in female patients with fecal incontinence: a comparison of 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and 2-dimensional endoanal ultrasound.
Oom DM; West RL; Schouten WR; Steensma AB
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Jun; 55(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 22595843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atrophy and defects detection of the external anal sphincter: comparison between three-dimensional anal endosonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging.
Cazemier M; Terra MP; Stoker J; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Boeckxstaens GE; Mulder CJ; Felt-Bersma RJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jan; 49(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 16328609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Comparison of Exoanal and Endoanal Ultrasound.
Zhao B; Li Y; Tang Y; Guo Y; Yang Y; Wen L; Dietz HP
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Sep; 42(9):2031-2038. PubMed ID: 36916688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of diagnostic criteria for significant anal sphincter defects between endoanal and transperineal ultrasound.
Okeahialam NA; Thakar R; Sultan AH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 60(6):793-799. PubMed ID: 35638253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?
Volløyhaug I; Taithongchai A; Arendsen L; van Gruting I; Sultan AH; Thakar R
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Jul; 31(7):1471-1478. PubMed ID: 32198534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of vaginal delivery on anal sphincter function in Asian primigravida: a prospective study.
Wickramasinghe DP; Senaratne S; Senanayake H; Samarasekera DN
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1375-81. PubMed ID: 26951430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury.
Jordan PA; Naidu M; Thakar R; Sultan AH
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1579-1588. PubMed ID: 29600403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic capabilities of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) to evaluate anal sphincter defect post obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS)? A systematic review.
Hakim S; Santoso BI; Djusad S; Moegni F; Surya R; Kurniawan AP
J Ultrasound; 2023 Jun; 26(2):393-399. PubMed ID: 36630015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term function and morphology of the anal sphincters and the pelvic floor after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury.
Soerensen MM; Pedersen BG; Santoro GA; Buntzen S; Bek K; Laurberg S
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Oct; 16(10):O347-55. PubMed ID: 24502361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anal incontinence: diagnosis by endoanal US or endovaginal MRI.
Pinta T; Kylänpää ML; Luukkonen P; Tapani E; Kivisaari A; Kivisaari L
Eur Radiol; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1472-7. PubMed ID: 15064853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
